2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences of malic acid isomers and their application levels on fermentation quality and biochemical characteristics of alfalfa silage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the lactic acid content of the CAL and MAL groups was higher compared with the other groups (P < 0.05). These findings were consistent with previous data, indicating that CAL can increase the lactic acid content, while MAL has various effects (Ke W. C. et al, 2018). The acetic acid content of all groups was similar.…”
Section: Cf Fermentation Qualitysupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the lactic acid content of the CAL and MAL groups was higher compared with the other groups (P < 0.05). These findings were consistent with previous data, indicating that CAL can increase the lactic acid content, while MAL has various effects (Ke W. C. et al, 2018). The acetic acid content of all groups was similar.…”
Section: Cf Fermentation Qualitysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The pH in all treatment groups was dramatically reduced after fermentation (P < 0.05), and the pH values of the additive-treated groups were below 4.2 (except for the LAB group), ensuring the good preservation of CF silage. Li et al (2016) and He et al (2019) have shown a similar pH of CAtreated silage, while the higher pH of MA-treated silage has been reported by and Ke W. C. et al, 2018. The lactic acid content in all treatments groups was remarkably elevated (P < 0.05).…”
Section: Cf Fermentation Qualitysupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This might be owing to the lower pH of inoculated silages, which inhibited the growth of undesirable microorganisms and preserved more nutrients during ensiling [57]. The higher WSC concentration in inoculant-treated silages might be owing to the lower pH as well as acid degradation of hemicellulose [58], which is consistent with the lower aNDF concentration in inoculated silages. The lower WSC concentration in F17-treated silage compared with LPB and LPN-treated silages might be because of soluble carbohydrates released by acid or enzymatic hydrolysis of polysaccharides that were used by LAB in F17 treatment for lactic acid production during ensiling [59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This may be due to the fact that the addition of cellulase leads to a dramatic increase in the number of lactic acid bacteria and expands the effect of anaerobic fermentation [38]. On the other hand, alfalfa have been identified as having high antibacterial activity [39], which may inhibit the growth of cellulase. In the current experiment, as the silage time prolonged, the lactic acid content decreased and the pH value increased significantly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%