2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences of poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) on soil microbiota and plant growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
70
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
70
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to other studies that have reported altered bacterial communities in soils under BDMs (Koitabashi et al, 2012;Li et al, 2014b;Muroi et al, 2016), and under non-biodegradable plastic mulches (Farmer et al, 2017;Munoz et al, 2015). Such opposite findings could be due to differences in methodology: For example, the studies by Koitabashi et al (2012) and Muroi et al (2016) were shorter laboratory incubation studies in controlled conditions (28 • C to 30 • C), used pure polymer feedstock rather than commercial film formulations which include plasticizers and other additives, and relied on different detection methods such as polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE). Laboratory studies under controlled conditions often result in more rapid microbial responses to treatments compared to field studies where variable environments introduce more noise.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to other studies that have reported altered bacterial communities in soils under BDMs (Koitabashi et al, 2012;Li et al, 2014b;Muroi et al, 2016), and under non-biodegradable plastic mulches (Farmer et al, 2017;Munoz et al, 2015). Such opposite findings could be due to differences in methodology: For example, the studies by Koitabashi et al (2012) and Muroi et al (2016) were shorter laboratory incubation studies in controlled conditions (28 • C to 30 • C), used pure polymer feedstock rather than commercial film formulations which include plasticizers and other additives, and relied on different detection methods such as polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE). Laboratory studies under controlled conditions often result in more rapid microbial responses to treatments compared to field studies where variable environments introduce more noise.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Characterizing the soil microbial communities under the different biodegradable mulches and non-biodegradable PE mulch revealed no significant effect of mulch type on bacterial community structure. This is in contrast to other studies that have reported altered bacterial communities in soils under BDMs (29, 40, 41), and under non-biodegradable plastic mulches (42, 43). Such opposite findings could be due to differences in methodology: for example, the studies by Koitabashi et al (40) and Muroi et al (41) were shorter laboratory incubation studies in controlled conditions (28 to 30°C), used pure polymer feedstock (rather than commercial film formulations which include plasticizers and other additives) and relied on detection methods such as polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that enrichment was observed under BDM but not the PE plots in WA, suggesting that this is response to the incorporation of BDMs into the soil (as opposed to an indirect effect of microclimate modification, such as soil warming). Previous studies have also demonstrated increased fungal abundances in soil because of BDM incorporation (29, 41, 49, 50). Fungi have been observed to be important colonizers and degraders of BDMs (30, 40, 41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations