2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11160-015-9391-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences of size and sex on invasive species aggression and native species vulnerability: a case for modern regression techniques

Abstract: Animal behaviour is of fundamental importance but is often overlooked in biological invasion research. A problem with such studies is that they may add pressure to already threatened species and subject vulnerable individuals to increased risk. One solution is to obtain the maximum possible information from the generated data using a variety of statistical techniques, instead of solely using simple versions of linear regression or generalized linear models as is customary. Here, we exemplify and compare the us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 20-minute observation period began 30 s after the screened divider was removed. The number of fin nips (including attempted nips) and chases (rapid chasing followed by a response by the pursued animal) were observed on all four mosquitofish or sailfin mollies and all four guppies (Thompson et al 2012, Magellan andGarc ıa-Berthou 2015). The observer was able to see all animals in the tank.…”
Section: Aggression Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 20-minute observation period began 30 s after the screened divider was removed. The number of fin nips (including attempted nips) and chases (rapid chasing followed by a response by the pursued animal) were observed on all four mosquitofish or sailfin mollies and all four guppies (Thompson et al 2012, Magellan andGarc ıa-Berthou 2015). The observer was able to see all animals in the tank.…”
Section: Aggression Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As toothcarp 2 (T2) received no or very few mating attempts (see section "Results") this data set was excluded from analyses and only the mating attempts received by T1 and M1 were included. For these analyses we used Generalized Estimating Equations (GEEs), an extension of Generalized Linear Models developed for situations where response variables are nonindependent, to account for the within-subjects factors (e.g., Magellan and García-Berthou, 2015). For all analyses, fish group was the experimental unit (i.e., the two toothcarp and two mosquitofish that were examined together) and the dependent variable, frequency of mating attempts received, was analyzed with Poisson distribution and a log-link function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activity of redfins without any external stimuli was examined to establish normal redfin behaviour patterns. Only the pre‐stimuli observation data were used in a generalised estimating equation (GEE; an extension of generalised linear models for use when dependent variables are related rather than independent: Magellan & García‐Berthou, ). Behaviour type (in refugia, motionless and movement) was the within‐subjects independent factor and time spent performing each behaviour (normal distribution and identity‐link function) as the dependent factor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%