2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2010.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influencing factors of sodium dodecyl sulfate sedimentation in bread wheat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
13
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, the environmental effects were greater than the genetic effects when determining the phenotypic variation of SDS trait. This result contradicts Oelofse et al (2010), who observed that the genetic component was responsible for over 80% of the variation. In general, the highest values of SDS were obtained by Fundacep Cristalino, Uppercase letters indicate significant differences among locations for the same cultivar, while lowercase letters indicate significant differences between cultivars in a particular location, according to Scott Knott test at 5% probability of error.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…In the current study, the environmental effects were greater than the genetic effects when determining the phenotypic variation of SDS trait. This result contradicts Oelofse et al (2010), who observed that the genetic component was responsible for over 80% of the variation. In general, the highest values of SDS were obtained by Fundacep Cristalino, Uppercase letters indicate significant differences among locations for the same cultivar, while lowercase letters indicate significant differences between cultivars in a particular location, according to Scott Knott test at 5% probability of error.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…As it might be expected, the IS-SDS tended to be associated with agronomic variables just as they did with PROT, reaching a negative correlation only with GW. The absence of significant correlation between grain yield and IS-SDS contradicts the results obtained by other authors (Oelofse et al 2010), where both variables were negatively associated. The relationship between LASRC and agronomic variables was opposed to what was revealed by PROT.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Sometimes grain protein content was not reflected in the quality of the flour, while the sodium dodecyl sulphate sedimentation test (IS-SDS) did (Peighambardoust et al 2011). A negative association between IS-SDS and GY, reported by Oelofse et al (2010), is attributed to the highly positive correlation between IS-SDS and PROT. The Lactic Acid SRC (LASRC) test is associated with glutenin network formation and gluten strength of flour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wheat dough and dough-based multiple characteristics are influenced by irreplaceable rheological properties of grain that have strongly been influenced by the quantity and type of storage proteins in the grain endosperm (Shewry and Halford 2002). High-quality wheat for bread-making has a high protein concentration with other features such as high specific weight, protein quality (conferring strong doughs) (Oury and Godin 2007), HFN (indicating lower alphaamylase activity) (Smith and Gooding 1996), high sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) sedimentation volume (indicating gluten strength) (Oelofse et al 2012), and free of black points and fungal contamination (Gooding and Davies 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic, climatic, and agronomic factors are the major players which control this inverse relationship. A grain quality estimate may be checked through SDS sedimentation volume test which derives the amount of gluten and protein quantity as well as quality (Oelofse et al 2012). Contrary to SDS sedimentation volume test, grain sulphur (S) concentration assesses the baking quality of cereals more accurately than crude protein concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%