Informal Spaces: The Geography of Informal Economic Activities in Brussels

Abstract

This paper unravels the relations between different categories of the informal economy and their spatial distribution in the geographical setting of Brussels. Micro perspectives (households as economic agents) and macro perspectives (the informal economy related to economic recession) are combined in order to deal with categories of informal activities which are homogenous in terms of their spatial logic. In the first part we review several classifications of informal economic activities and assess them in terms of their congruence with the distinctions of economic actors and spatial logic. The second part elaborates on the raisons d'�tre of three large categories of informal economic activities in relation to urban development and on the production environments of these activities in Brussels: the domestic sector and suburban development; economic recession and survival strategies in the inner city; and, finally, flexibility and informalization in urban light industry. Polanyi's concept of modes of economic integration (market, redistribution and reciprocity) offers a powerful tool to understand informal economic activities as a set of interrelations between households and other economic actors in order to gain access to their living resources Copyright Joint Editors and Blackwell Publishers Ltd 1999.

Who Engages in Undeclared Work in Urban Europe? A Critical Evaluation of the Marginality Thesis

“…On the one hand, there has been a long-standing belief at all spatial scales that the undeclared economy is more prevalent in poorer areas. This is viewed as the case whether one is discussing global regions [4,17], variations between nations [14,18], local and regional variations [9,16] or urban-rural variations [19,20]. On the other hand, groups that are relatively marginalised from the formal labour market are also believed to be more likely to work in the undeclared economy.…”

An evaluation of the shadow economy in Baltic states: a tax morale perspective

“…Over the past decade or so, a number of studies have shown that the size of the shadow economy is not evenly distributed but rather, varies across not only global regions (ILO, 2013), cross-nationally (Putni š and Sauka, 2012Sauka, , 2013Sauka, , 2014aSchneider, 2013;Schneider and Williams, 2013;Williams, 2014bWilliams, ,c, 2015b) and locally and regionally (Kesteloot and Meert, 1999;Williams and Windebank, 2001), but also according to various socio-demographic and socio-economic variables such as gender (ILO, 2013;Leonard, 1994Leonard, , 1998St nculescu, 2005), age (Pedersen, 2003), employment status (Brill, 2011;Leonard, 1994;Slavnic, 2010;Taiwo, 2013) and income level (Barbour and Llanes, 2013;Williams, 2004). The consequence has been that a more contextualised understanding has emerged which recognises how the shadow economy can be large and growing in some populations, but smaller and declining in others (Pfau-Effinger, 2009;Putni š and Sauka, 2014a,b;Sepulveda and Syrett, 2007;Williams, 2013Williams, , 2014bWilliams, ,c,2015a.…”

Explaining the Prevalence of the Informal Economy in the Baltics: an Institutional Asymmetry Perspective

“…Numerous studies have revealed how the prevalence of the informal economy varies not only cross-nationally (ILO, 2012;Schneider and Williams, 2013) but also locally and regionally (Kesteloot and Meert, 1999) and by employment status (Slavnic, 2010;Taiwo, 2013), age (Pedersen, 2003), gender (ILO, 2013 and income level (Barbour and Llanes, 2013;Williams, 2009). The outcome has been a more contextualised understanding which recognises how the informal economy can be large and growing in some populations, but smaller and declining in others (Pfau-Effinger, 2009;Williams and Horodnic, 2015).…”