2018 IEEE Photonics Conference (IPC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/ipcon.2018.8527126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information-Theoretic Tools for Optical Communications Engineers

Abstract: Fundamental information-theoretic concepts are explained for nonspecialists, with emphasis on their practical usage. The notions of a "FEC threshold" and a "nonlinear Shannon limit" are critically reviewed, highlighting their limitations and possible alternatives.Index Terms-Achievable information rate, bit error rate, block error rate, channel capacity, FEC limit, FEC threshold, fiber-optic communications, forward error-correction coding, generalized mutual information, nonlinear Kerr effect.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows the SBRNN autoencoders to significantly outperform FFNN at any examined distance. Moreover, our results indicate that the SBRNN designs can enable communication below the 4 · 10 −3 HD-FEC threshold [25] at distances of 70 km, which is a substantial increase over the achievable distance of 50 km below HD-FEC for the FFNN. The Tx-PAM2 & Rx-FFNN (Z = 61) system, whose receiver simultaneously processes relatively the same number of samples as the SBRNN (488 to 480), is as well outperformed by both the vanilla and the LSTM-GRU designs at all distances up to 80 km.…”
Section: System Performance Validationmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This allows the SBRNN autoencoders to significantly outperform FFNN at any examined distance. Moreover, our results indicate that the SBRNN designs can enable communication below the 4 · 10 −3 HD-FEC threshold [25] at distances of 70 km, which is a substantial increase over the achievable distance of 50 km below HD-FEC for the FFNN. The Tx-PAM2 & Rx-FFNN (Z = 61) system, whose receiver simultaneously processes relatively the same number of samples as the SBRNN (488 to 480), is as well outperformed by both the vanilla and the LSTM-GRU designs at all distances up to 80 km.…”
Section: System Performance Validationmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The performance metric considered to compare the receiver configurations under test is the received SNR required for a BER at the KP4 forward error correction (FEC) threshold (BER = 2.24 · 10 −4 [49]). The receivers will then be benchmarked considering the SNR penalty, i.e., the difference in required receiver SNR, with respect to a simple reference receiver.…”
Section: Short-reach Transmission Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the performance requirement for the optical layer has been a BER after FEC decoding down to 10 −15 following standards for fiber communications [2], [25]. More modern performance metrics are based on information theory, which quantifies achievable information rates (AIRs) to lowerbound the capacity.…”
Section: A Achievable Rates and Metrics As Post-fec Ber Predictormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FEC is assumed to be a DVB-S2 low-density parity-check code [46] with codeword length n c = 64800 and code rate R c = 5/6. The modulation 2 Here "instance" refers to the number of DM circuits that have to be implemented in parallel on the ASIC. While the latest CMOS logic circuitry can operate at hundreds of GHz, the throughput of optical communication links reaches hundreds of Gb/s to Tb/s.…”
Section: Frame Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation