1984
DOI: 10.1109/tassp.1984.1164389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information tradeoffs in using the sample autocorrelation function in ARMA parameter estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, there exists an optimal weight matrix W(8), as given by the following theorem. This theorem shows that the weight matrix (16) provides an optimal (in the sense of minimum asymptotic variance) weighted least squares estimate, i.e. it is optimal in the class of estimates (12).…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, there exists an optimal weight matrix W(8), as given by the following theorem. This theorem shows that the weight matrix (16) provides an optimal (in the sense of minimum asymptotic variance) weighted least squares estimate, i.e. it is optimal in the class of estimates (12).…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying the operator ¢(Bl) to equation (3.6) and using the previous corollary we obtain (ii). [] We end this section with a generalization of the Bruzzone and Kaveh's result (see Bruzzone and Kaveh (1984)). Although Corollary 1.1 shows that Rg(k) can be obtained as the solution of the difference equation ¢2(B)Rg(k) = O, for k > 2q+ 1, subject to the initial conditions given by the even property of Rg(k), we state the result in the form obtained in Bruzzone and Kaveh (1984).…”
Section: Some Sufficient Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This is indeed the case. Bruzzone and Kaveh (1984) obtained closed form formulae for Fk,t in the ARMA case under some restrictions on the roots of the ARMA polynomials (they should be complex and simple). Their solution is in terms of the roots of the ARMA polynomials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then we have the inequalities 0 ≤ n 1 ≤ n and 0 ≤ m 1 ≤ m. Because all coefficients of A(q) and B(q) are real-valued, the pure complex poles and zeros occur in complex conjugate pairs, and consequently the differences n − n 1 and m − m 1 are both even integers. For the pure complex poles and zeros we apply the parametrization in [5]:…”
Section: Appendix: the Asymptotic Fisher Information Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluate next the entry (u, v) of the Fisher information matrix for u ∈ P ρ Z ρ and v ∈ P µ P φ Z µ Z φ . It is not difficult to prove that When u, v ∈ P µ Z µ P φ Z φ , we can apply the formulas given in [5] for the computation of J u,v in case all the poles and the zeros are purely complex. Analyzing the sign of the product S u S v , we find that the matrix J(θ) can be re-written more compactly as J(θ) =…”
Section: Appendix: the Asymptotic Fisher Information Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%