2012
DOI: 10.1108/03090561211212476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Informing a new business‐to‐business relationship:

Abstract: Purpose -Firms face the challenge of working with other firms in their business network so as to increase the value of products and services offered to end customers and consumers. This often requires managers to invest in developing strong and effective business-to-business relationships. While an extensive literature examines the different dimensions of successful business-to-business relationships, little research examines how perceived corporate identity is likely to influence market relationships. This pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Corporate identity comes with the notion that each organization has its own personality and consumer perceptions of the identity that is communicated contribute to the responses that are made towards the organization's activities and products (Simões, Dibb, & Fisk, 2005;Simões & Mason, 2012). Brand personality is "the set of human characteristics associated with a brand" (Aaker, 1997, p. 347).…”
Section: Brand Personification On Twittermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corporate identity comes with the notion that each organization has its own personality and consumer perceptions of the identity that is communicated contribute to the responses that are made towards the organization's activities and products (Simões, Dibb, & Fisk, 2005;Simões & Mason, 2012). Brand personality is "the set of human characteristics associated with a brand" (Aaker, 1997, p. 347).…”
Section: Brand Personification On Twittermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commitment level to CSP emanate from how firms rationalize their CSP practice with underlying value addition and/or legitimacy credentials in their communication (Borgerson et al , 2009; Schumann et al , 1991) toward economic and non-economic objectives (Drumwright, 1996). Because CSP communication on firm websites comes from controlled sources and forms part of the firm’s identity mix, firms can rationalize CSP with their philosophy, sense of purpose and core values to distinguish themselves from others (Simões and Mason, 2012). Rationalization of CSP with informative content has an enduring positive effect on stakeholders irrespective of whether they have a high or low level of identification with the firm (Kim, 2019).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously, we used three separate coders to classify firms into three categories based on the tone of the rationale for their CSP and in cases of disagreement used the majority vote. This categorization has theoretical basis from the literature review that we presented previously in the paper (Borgerson et al , 2009; Drumwright, 1996; Schumann et al , 1991; Simões and Mason, 2012). We describe these below.…”
Section: Research Design Data Collection and Data Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within supply networks, suppliers and buyers understand and interpret their trading partners' CI, which affects the business agreements reached and, ultimately, business performance (Robson, Leonidou, & Katsikeas, 2002;Simões & Mason, 2012). While the industrial marketing literature generates valuable insights into what makes relationships work, for example higher levels of commitment, co-operation and trust (Crespin-Mazet & Ghauri, 2007;Morgan & Hunt, 1994), much less is known about the materials that help this happen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continuity of exchanges and the emergence of routinized exchange practices stress the need for underlying corporate postures and behavioural consistency. The corporate identity (CI) literature highlights the role of visuals and materials in shaping business relationships development (Simões & Mason, 2012) and contributes to the visual turn in management and organizational studies (Bell, Warren, & Schroeder, 2014;Höllerer, Jancsary, Meyer, & Vettori;Meyer, Höllerer, Jancsary, & van Leeuwen, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%