Infrastructural Inequality and Household COVID-19 Vulnerability in a South African Urban Settlement

Abstract

COVID-19 has highlighted the importance of household infrastructure in containing the spread of SARS-CoV-2, with Global South urban settlements particularly vulnerable. Targeted interventions have used area or dwelling type as proxies for infrastructural vulnerability, potentially missing vulnerable households. We use infrastructural determinants of COVID-19 (crowding, water source, toilet facilities, and indoor pollution) to create an Infrastructural Vulnerability Index using cross-sectional household data (2018–2019) from Mamelodi, a low-income urban settlement in South Africa. Households were stratified into vulnerability groups by index results; sociodemographic variables were assessed as predictors of index scores; and inequality analysis and decomposition were conducted. Thirty-three percent of households fell in the lowest risk group, 32% in the second, 21% in the third, and 14% in the highest. Dwelling type and geographical ward were associated with changes in index scores, with a shack (adjusted β (a β ) = 3.45, CI = 3.39–3.51) associated with highest increase compared to a house. Wards in more developed areas were not consistently associated with lower index scores in the final regression model. The infrastructural vulnerability of the top 10% of households was greater than the bottom 40%, and inequality was predominantly within (80%) rather than between (20%) wards, and more between (60%) than within (40%) dwelling types. Our results show a minority of households account for the majority of infrastructural vulnerability, with its distribution only partially explained by area and dwelling type. Efforts to contain COVID-19 can be improved by using local-level data, and a vulnerability index, to target infrastructural support to households in greatest need. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11524-022-00625-7.

Association between Family Functioning, Child Emotional and Behavioral Problems, and Parental Stress during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Thailand

“…Low socioeconomic status signifies more vulnerability in several aspects, as it means less opportunity to access adaptive resources, such as safe outdoor activities and healthy food, and also less access to the healthcare system [50][51][52]. It should be noted that the disease outbreak made inequality more evident in many countries, including Thailand [53,54].…”

Morbimortalidade por COVID-19 no contexto social da região de saúde Cariri, Ceará

“…Percebe-se, neste estudo, que indicadores de vulnerabilidade social podem ser influenciadores do aumento de casos de COVID-19. Em pesquisa realizada nos bairros de Fortaleza, Ceará, evidenciou-se que os indicadores possuíam influência na incidência da COVID-19 na metrópole, ou seja, quanto maior o nível de escolaridade, menor é o risco de contrair o vírus (19,20,21) .…”

Vaccine Hesitancy in India: Facilitators and Inhibitors

“…In a big and diverse country like India, lack of vaccine convenience would be a serious impediment to vaccine uptake. Vaccine convenience is marked by the rural–urban divide (Sun & Monnat, 2022), technological divide (Sharma, 2021), infrastructural inequalities (Marcus & Marcus, 2022), and so on and all of these would lead to vaccine hesitancy. According to reports in India, urban centers managed to receive the lion’s share of the vaccine leaving a large rural population vulnerable to the deadly coronavirus (Ray, 2022).…”