1998
DOI: 10.1080/13583883.1998.9966945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infrastructure and tools for successful institutional innovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the nature of change varies among scholars with debates that highlight differing emphasis on socioeconomic and political change (Halpern 2005), change in the new power topology (Clapp et al 2016), technological change (Mia 2020; Perry 2021), managerial change (Parrado 2008), and technical change for economic development and knowledge acquisition processes (Oyelaran-Oyeyinka 2006;Ruttan 2006). Some studies argue that reform for institutional improvement is crucial, not only to boost quality levels of outputs (Azadegan et al 2013) but also procedurally to ensure quality exchanges within cooperative networks (Brinckmann 1998). However, other researchers offer a contrasting perspective that considers negative impacts of limits and constraints such as institutional voids in areas of inadequate support (Turker and Vural 2017), triggering a rethinking and reimagining of existing formal institutional frameworks (Onsongo 2019; Chebrolu and Dutta 2021).…”
Section: Institutional Reform and Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, the nature of change varies among scholars with debates that highlight differing emphasis on socioeconomic and political change (Halpern 2005), change in the new power topology (Clapp et al 2016), technological change (Mia 2020; Perry 2021), managerial change (Parrado 2008), and technical change for economic development and knowledge acquisition processes (Oyelaran-Oyeyinka 2006;Ruttan 2006). Some studies argue that reform for institutional improvement is crucial, not only to boost quality levels of outputs (Azadegan et al 2013) but also procedurally to ensure quality exchanges within cooperative networks (Brinckmann 1998). However, other researchers offer a contrasting perspective that considers negative impacts of limits and constraints such as institutional voids in areas of inadequate support (Turker and Vural 2017), triggering a rethinking and reimagining of existing formal institutional frameworks (Onsongo 2019; Chebrolu and Dutta 2021).…”
Section: Institutional Reform and Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strategy (Ross 1989;Drew 1995;Brinckmann 1998;Hage and Hollingsworth 2000;Koh 2006;Wallman 2009;Cooke and Saini 2010;Kitagawa and Robertson 2011;Hung and Whittington 2011;Sartor and Beamish 2014;Villavicencio et al 2015;Smink et al 2015;Abramov et al 2019;Yang et al 2019; Yano and Shiraishi 2020) Institutional ownership (Hoskisson et al 2002;Yi et al 2017;Sakaki and Jory 2019) Participatory governance (Whitley 2000;Casper and Matraves 2003;Yoshikawa et al 2007;Rahman et al 2009;Genus 2012;Li et al 2012;Yi et al 2012;Clausen 2014;Zhang and Putzel 2016;Yang et al 2017;Elle 2017;Bekhet and Latif 2018;Yang 2018;Huber-Stearns et al 2019) Technology readiness, transfer, and support Technology skills, methods, and processes used to achieve institutional goals…”
Section: Current Economic Position Of Nations or Regions That Evolves According To Institutional Cyclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation