2011 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops (BIBMW) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/bibmw.2011.6112547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infrastructure for sharing standardized clinical brain scans across hospitals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to automate other data curation steps the dataset first needs to follow a structured format, making our tool a crucial first step in the overall pipeline. The increasing data complexity, both in volume and in the number of different types of data, not only shows a need for a proper data curation pipeline, but also shows the need for a standardized data structure for scans and their associated metadata (van Erp et al 2011;Gorgolewski et al 2016;Lambin et al 2017). The widespread adoption of a common, standardized data structure would be favorable over the use of our tool or similar tools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to automate other data curation steps the dataset first needs to follow a structured format, making our tool a crucial first step in the overall pipeline. The increasing data complexity, both in volume and in the number of different types of data, not only shows a need for a proper data curation pipeline, but also shows the need for a standardized data structure for scans and their associated metadata (van Erp et al 2011;Gorgolewski et al 2016;Lambin et al 2017). The widespread adoption of a common, standardized data structure would be favorable over the use of our tool or similar tools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-data are descriptive elements associated with data that provide additional clarity regarding acquisition parameters, experimental conditions, analysis procedures, and any other formation about the experiment or analyses that helps one understand and use the data. The benefits of neuroimage data sharing was introduced more than a decade ago (Van Horn et al, 2001; Van Horn and Gazzaniga, 2002), several successful data sharing projects exist (Biswal et al, 2010; Weiner et al, 2012; Nooner et al, 2012), and many of the technical, legal, and social issues of data sharing have been discussed (Poline et al, 2012; Milham, 2012; Mennes et al, 2012), but there currently is no standard format nor a set of lightweight tools that allow small laboratories or individual investigators to share imaging and meta-data in a structured way, nor a set of tools that allows for queries across existing databases or data sharing efforts (Poline et al, 2012). These problems are especially acute when attempting to construct large datasets from data available through online repositories, each of which uses different structures of storing meta-data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%