2016
DOI: 10.5604/17348412.1229664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infuence of oxygen and nitrogen plasma treatment on polypropyleme (PP) bumper surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several advantages to surface activation of biomaterials with oxygen plasma beyond biocompatibility. Typically, surface oxidation for hydrophilization occurs only within a depth of 5–50 nm from the surface, indicating that plasma activation does not alter the bulk properties of the materials 41,42 . Therefore, the materials can maintain their mechanical properties such as strength, flexibility, formability, stability/degradability while the surfaces are modified to be more bioactive 18 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several advantages to surface activation of biomaterials with oxygen plasma beyond biocompatibility. Typically, surface oxidation for hydrophilization occurs only within a depth of 5–50 nm from the surface, indicating that plasma activation does not alter the bulk properties of the materials 41,42 . Therefore, the materials can maintain their mechanical properties such as strength, flexibility, formability, stability/degradability while the surfaces are modified to be more bioactive 18 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the use of this well-known technique for activation of electrospun fibers is currently described in only relatively few publications [ 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 ] and requires a comprehensive investigation and optimal adjustment of the plasma treatment parameters to maintain the mechanical and teno-inductive integrity. Nitrogen (N 2 ) plasma could represent an ideal working gas due to its less aggressivity and destructivity compared to oxidizing plasma (O 2 ) that lead to surface etching and destruction due to its high molecular size [ 97 , 98 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Takamatsu et al investigated the generation of H and OH radicals by a plasma jet of N 2 or O 2 using 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline- N -oxide, and indicated that N 2 plasma generated more H and OH radicals than O 2 plasma . Altuncu et al plasma-treated polypropylene samples using an atmospheric N 2 or O 2 plasma activation unit and showed that the surface energy was higher in N 2 plasma than in O 2 plasma under the same process conditions . Barkhordari and Ganjovi examined the physical properties of the plasma jet generated from an O 2 /N 2 mixture, and observed that the electron density decreased as the proportion of O 2 in the O 2 /N 2 mixture increased .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 Altuncu et al plasma-treated polypropylene samples using an atmospheric N 2 or O 2 plasma activation unit and showed that the surface energy was higher in N 2 plasma than in O 2 plasma under the same process conditions. 33 Barkhordari and Ganjovi examined the physical properties of the plasma jet generated from an O 2 / N 2 mixture, and observed that the electron density decreased as the proportion of O 2 in the O 2 /N 2 mixture increased. 34 When air was used in this device, the electron density increased and the electron impact dissociation reactions were promoted.…”
Section: = ×mentioning
confidence: 99%