2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ingestion of a Cold Temperature/Menthol Beverage Increases Outdoor Exercise Performance in a Hot, Humid Environment

Abstract: PurposeA recent laboratory study demonstrated that the ingestion of a cold/menthol beverage improved exercise performance in a hot and humid environment during 20 km of all-out cycling. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether the ingestion of cold water/ice-slurry with menthol would improve performance in hot and humid outdoor conditions.MethodsTen trained males completed three trials of five blocks consisting of 4-km cycling and 1.5-km running. During warm-up, every block and recovery, the a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(78 reference statements)
1
54
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, only 1 study was performed in moderate ambient conditions (28°C) 65 . Within this study, the ingestion of a menthol aromatized beverage of 3°C was not effective in improving exercise performance (3%, ES = 0.32), whereas a menthol ice slurry (0.2°C) did significantly improve performance (6.2%, ES = 0.67).…”
Section: Combination Of Pre- and Per-coolingmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Furthermore, only 1 study was performed in moderate ambient conditions (28°C) 65 . Within this study, the ingestion of a menthol aromatized beverage of 3°C was not effective in improving exercise performance (3%, ES = 0.32), whereas a menthol ice slurry (0.2°C) did significantly improve performance (6.2%, ES = 0.67).…”
Section: Combination Of Pre- and Per-coolingmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…One additional study (Riera, Trong, Sinnapah, & Hue, 2014) was identifi ed through cross-referencing eligible studies. Th erefore, a total of 16 eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis (Burdon, Hoon, Johnson, Chapman, & O'Connor, 2013;Ihsan, Landers, Brearley, & Peeling, 2010;Jeff ries, Goldsmith, & Waldron, 2018;Maunder, Laursen, & Kilding, 2017;Riera et al, 2014;Siegel et al, 2010;Siegel, Mate, Watson, Nosaka, & Laursen, 2012;Stanley, Leveritt, & Peake, 2010;Stevens, Dascombe, Boyko, Sculley, & Callister, 2013;Stevens et al, 2016;Takeshima, Onitsuka, Xinyan, & Hasegawa, 2017;Tran Trong, Riera, Rinaldi, Briki, & Hue, 2015;.…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th e ice dose was standardized as ice slurry ingestion relative to the body mass (i.e., g·kg-1). Four studies did not report this value directly and the doses were estimated using the total fl uid consumption divided by the mean body mass reported in each study (Maunder et al, 2017;Riera et al, 2014;Stanley et al, 2010;Tran Trong et al, 2015). For one study (Riera et al, 2014), the ice dose was determined by combining the ice/fl uid ingestion during warm-up, immediately at the beginning of the performance trial, at the 1st, 2nd and 3rd 5-km of the 20-km time trial.…”
Section: Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations