1987
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.7.4.1465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ingi, a 5.2-kb dispersed sequence element from Trypanosoma brucei that carries half of a smaller mobile element at either end and has homology with mammalian LINEs.

Abstract: A dispersed repetitive element named ingi, which is present in the genome of the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma brucei, is described. One complete 5.2-kilobase element and the ends of two others were sequenced. There were no direct or inverted terminal repeats. Rather, the ends consisted of two halves of a previously described 512-base-pair transposable element (G. Hasan, M. J. Turner, and J. S. Cordingley, Cell 37:333-341, 1984). Oligo(dA) tails and possible insertion site duplications suggested that ingi is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
81
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(89 reference statements)
3
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7A). This is consistent with previous reports by others (25) and reflects the highly dispersed genomic organization of the Ingi retroposon family (22). We observed that the decay rate of the majority of the discrete transcripts visible by Northern blotting was similar in ago1 Ϫ/Ϫ and wild-type cells, with the exception of one transcript, indicated by an asterisk in Fig.…”
Section: Ago1 Affects the Accumulation Of Retroposon Transcriptssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…7A). This is consistent with previous reports by others (25) and reflects the highly dispersed genomic organization of the Ingi retroposon family (22). We observed that the decay rate of the majority of the discrete transcripts visible by Northern blotting was similar in ago1 Ϫ/Ϫ and wild-type cells, with the exception of one transcript, indicated by an asterisk in Fig.…”
Section: Ago1 Affects the Accumulation Of Retroposon Transcriptssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…6B, all clades were supported with significant bootstrap values (> 50%) using the neighbour-joining method used by the program NJ plot (Perrière and Gouy, 1996). Based on this analysis we found that nimbus (BgI) belongs to clade I (Malik et al, 1999), along with the CiI element of C. intenstinalis (Permanyer, et al, 2003), mosquI from the Aedes aegypti (Tu and Hill 1999), I factor from two different species of Drosophila (Fawcett et al, 1986), and the trypanosome L1 and INGI elements (Kimmel et al, 1987;Martin et al, 1995). Since this is an unrooted tree, the relationship between the major groups cannot be assigned definitively.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysis Of the Non-ltr Retrotransposon Nimbus mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…) and trypanosomes (Kimmel et al 1987;Teng et al 1995), LTR-retrotransposons have not been found in these lineages. This phylogeny thus suggests that the original LTR-retrotransposon RNH domain was acquired from a non-LTR retrotransposon.…”
Section: Non-ltr Retrotransposons Arose Earlier Than Ltr Retrotranspomentioning
confidence: 99%