2003
DOI: 10.1378/chest.124.4.1584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhaled Fluticasone Propionate by Diskus in the Treatment of Asthma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With FP, a numerically higher increase in pre-dose FEV 1 with twice-daily dosing than with once-daily dosing was observed. The difference between once and twice daily FP was in line with differences previously reported for FP once versus twice daily [18,19], although this supports the current indication for twice-daily dosing of FP in asthma the study was not powered nor designed to assess differences between once-daily and twice-daily dosing of FP, only to assess differences between either FP dosing regimen and placebo. FF appears to be suitable for once-daily dosing as both once-daily and twice-daily dosing (same total daily dose) produced similar improvements in lung function,.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…With FP, a numerically higher increase in pre-dose FEV 1 with twice-daily dosing than with once-daily dosing was observed. The difference between once and twice daily FP was in line with differences previously reported for FP once versus twice daily [18,19], although this supports the current indication for twice-daily dosing of FP in asthma the study was not powered nor designed to assess differences between once-daily and twice-daily dosing of FP, only to assess differences between either FP dosing regimen and placebo. FF appears to be suitable for once-daily dosing as both once-daily and twice-daily dosing (same total daily dose) produced similar improvements in lung function,.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In a previous 12-week study of FP dosed at 100 mg or 200 mg in ICS-naïve asthma patients FEV 1 was improved by 270 mL and 110 mL, respectively, compared with an 80 mL decline in the placebo group. 30,31 These findings suggest that the lack of efficacy observed with FP 100 mg twice-daily in this study resulted from the high placebo response, rather than a lack of efficacy with FP per se. There are a number of possible explanations for the high placebo response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%