Inhaled vs. oral alprazolam: subjective, behavioral and cognitive effects, and modestly increased abuse potential

Abstract

Rationale Infrahuman and human studies suggest that a determinant of the abuse potential of a drug is rate of onset of subjective effects. Objectives This study sought to determine if the rate of onset of subjective effects and abuse potential of alprazolam would be increased when administered via inhalation vs. the oral route. Methods Placebo, inhaled alprazolam (0.5, 1, 2 mg), and oral alprazolam (1, 2, 4 mg) were administered under double-blind, double-dummy conditions using a cross-over design in 14 healthy participants with histories of drug abuse. Participant and observer ratings, and behavioral and cognitive performance measures were assessed repeatedly during 9 hour sessions. Results Both routes of administration produced orderly dose and time-related effects, with higher doses producing greater and longer lasting effects. Onset of subjective effects following inhaled alprazolam was very rapid (e.g., 2 vs. 49 minutes after 2 mg inhaled vs. oral). On measures of abuse potential (e.g., liking and good effects), inhaled alprazolam was more potent, as evidenced by a leftward shift in the dose response curve. Despite the potency difference, at the highest doses, peak ratings of subjective effects related to abuse potential (e.g., “drug liking”) were similar across the two routes. On other measures (e.g., sedation and performance) the routes were equipotent. Conclusions The inhaled route of administration modestly increased the abuse potential of alprazolam despite significantly increasing its rate of onset. If marketed, the reduced availability and increased cost of inhaled alprazolam may render the societal risk of increased abuse to be low.

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessment of electronic cigarettes, combustible cigarettes, and nicotine gum: implications for abuse liability

“…However, nicotine gum yielded higher overall nicotine uptake than even the highest nicotine content Vuse Solo EC. Taken together, the findings in this study extend earlier findings with nicotine and other dependence-producing substances that the abuse liability of a given substance can be strongly influenced by the form or formulation and route of administration and is generally related to the speed of absorption of the substance (FDA 2010 , 2015 , 2017 ; Calderon and Klein 2014 ; Fant et al 1999 ; Fant et al 1997 ; Grudzinskas et al 2006 ; Henningfield and Keenan 1993 ; Reissig et al 2015 ).…”

Abuse liability of controlled-release oxycodone formulations

“…Singh, Jain, Ray, and Gupta 2001demonstrated that intravenous diazepam had a higher abuse liability than oral diazepam as it produced more rapid and greater positive subjective effects. However, Reissig, Harrison, Carter, and Griffiths (2015) showed that inhaled alprazolam only modestly increased positive subjective effects compared with those effects produced by oral alprazolam even though the time of the onset of effects was much more rapid in the former route. These results indicate that although typically some routes are associated with faster absorption and faster onset of effects, there are other factors that influence the magnitude of the subjective effects when comparing routes i.e.…”

Adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) study: Overview of substance use assessment methods

“…And at least one study reported that increased caffeine consumption is linked with increased risk-taking in adolescents ( Temple et al, 2017b ). Finally, prescription stimulant medications have been linked with cognitive enhancement ( Bagot and Kaminer, 2014 ; Coghill et al, 2014 ; Tamminga et al, 2016 ), while prescription anxiolytics/sedatives ( Meador et al, 2011 ; Loring et al, 2012 ; Reissig et al, 2015 ; Ghoneim et al, 1984 ) and opiates ( Allen et al, 2003 ; Schoedel et al, 2010 ) negatively impact memory, processing speed and attention. Over the counter (OTC) cough medication containing dextromethorphan has been linked with cortical thickness in adolescents in one study ( Qiu et al, 2016 ), although this outcome has yet been replicated.…”