2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.08.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibiting cyclin-dependent kinase 5 in the nucleus accumbens enhances the expression of amphetamine-induced locomotor conditioning

Abstract: When psychostimulant drugs like amphetamine are administered repeatedly in the presence of a contextual stimulus complex, long-lasting associations form between the unconditioned effects of the drug and the contextual stimuli. Here we assessed the role played by the proline-directed serine/threonine kinase cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5) in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) on the expression of the conditioned locomotion normally observed when rats are returned to a context previously paired with amphetamine. Infu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is also possible that the different neuronal events underlying the induction and expression of conditioning were differentially affected by changes in Cdk5 and Kal7 in these experiments, rendering the effects ultimately observed difficult to interpret. Supporting this possibility, we recently found that, unlike the results obtained in the present experiments, inhibiting NAcc Cdk5 not during exposure but immediately before testing enhanced the expression of amphetamine-induced locomotor conditioning and sensitization (Singer et al , in review). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…However, it is also possible that the different neuronal events underlying the induction and expression of conditioning were differentially affected by changes in Cdk5 and Kal7 in these experiments, rendering the effects ultimately observed difficult to interpret. Supporting this possibility, we recently found that, unlike the results obtained in the present experiments, inhibiting NAcc Cdk5 not during exposure but immediately before testing enhanced the expression of amphetamine-induced locomotor conditioning and sensitization (Singer et al , in review). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…As expected, rats that showed conditioned behavioral responding (Paired, IP AMPH) also showed conditioned increases in c-Fos expression in the NAcc shell (Figure 3c; one-way ANOVA, c-Fos/NeuN, % Control; F 2, 10 = 5.18, po0.05; Scheffé post hoc, Paired (264.25 ± 30.88 cells/rat) vs Unpaired (180.60 ± 16.17 cells/rat) or Control (216.50 ± 25.91 cells/rat), po0.05). This effect was not expected nor was it observed in the NAcc core (data not shown; one-way ANOVA, c-Fos/NeuN, F 2, 23 = 0.57, NS) as contextual stimuli are processed in the NAcc shell and not the NAcc core (Cruz et al, 2014a;Singer et al, 2014aSinger et al, , 2014b. Importantly, Paired rats that previously received intra-VTA amphetamine displayed neither conditioned locomotion nor increases in c-Fos expression in the NAcc shell (Figure 3d; one-way ANOVA, c-Fos/NeuN, % Control; F 2, 14 = 0.18, NS; Paired (590.33 ± 58.72 cells/rat), Unpaired (676.00 ± 62.73 cells/rat), Control (575.50 ± 44.76 cells/rat)).…”
Section: Associative Conditioningmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This leads to the development of conditioned drugseeking behavior in the presence of cues, thereby increasing chances of reinforcement. Interestingly, the development of associative conditioning parallels the formation of nonassociative sensitized behavioral and neurochemical responding to amphetamine (Singer et al, 2009(Singer et al, , 2014aVezina and Leyton, 2009) and both have been implicated in escalated drug use in humans and animal models Vezina, 2013, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavioral training and testing were conducted as previously described (Singer et al, 2016, 2014a, 2014b). Briefly, rats were conditioned using a discrimination learning paradigm over the course of five consecutive 3-day blocks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein expression was examined specifically in the NAcc shell because this site is known to process contextual, as opposed to discrete, stimulus information (Bossert et al, 2013, 2007; Everitt and Robbins, 2005; Singer et al, 2014a, 2014b). Contextual cues also elicit rapid changes in dendritic spine morphology in the NAcc shell (Singer et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%