2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition and generation of saccades: Rapid event-related fMRI of prosaccades, antisaccades, and nogo trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

17
106
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
17
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to saccade-related neurons in the FEF, which show reduced preparatory discharge for antisaccade versus prosaccade commands that is associated with fewer errors (Everling and Munoz, 2000), those in the SEF show increased activity that predicts accurate performance (Schlag-Rey et al, 1997;Amador et al, 2004). The SEF also shows increased fMRI activity for antisaccade versus prosaccade trials in this and other studies (Brown et al, 2006). If, as has been theorized, the SEF contributes to generating internally versus visually guided eye movements (Everling and Munoz, 2000;Amador et al, 2004), activity reductions in trials after antisaccades could contribute to prolonged saccadic latencies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In contrast to saccade-related neurons in the FEF, which show reduced preparatory discharge for antisaccade versus prosaccade commands that is associated with fewer errors (Everling and Munoz, 2000), those in the SEF show increased activity that predicts accurate performance (Schlag-Rey et al, 1997;Amador et al, 2004). The SEF also shows increased fMRI activity for antisaccade versus prosaccade trials in this and other studies (Brown et al, 2006). If, as has been theorized, the SEF contributes to generating internally versus visually guided eye movements (Everling and Munoz, 2000;Amador et al, 2004), activity reductions in trials after antisaccades could contribute to prolonged saccadic latencies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Activation of the posterior parietal lobule (left side, in particular) has been associated with motor attention (see Rushworth et al, 2003 for a review). For instance, both anti-saccade and 'no-go' activated these brain regions to a greater extent then pro-saccade in an oculomotor countermanding task (Brown et al, 2006). Furthermore, we have argued in our previous work that greater visual cortical activation during SS compared to SE trials may reflect greater foveal attention during the stop signal task (Li et al, 2006a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Together, the 31 impulse regressors for a given condition modeled the activation time course for trials in this condition with two points/s over 15 s. Thus each group of trials yielded 31 columns to a subject's GLM design matrix, with ones at the appropriate locations, to model the 31 impulse functions for that trial group (Brown et al 2006;Dale 1999;Serences 2004). Fitting this design matrix to the resampled data automatically deconvolves the time series of each RS condition (Brown et al 2006), without making any assumption about the shape of the activation profile, other than its length (15 s in this case). Because of the random ordering of the four trial types, effects of previous trials are balanced out in this analysis (it is assumed that the hemodynamic response is linear), as is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Linear Deconvolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%