1966
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1966.29.3.467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of central vestibular neurons from the contralateral labyrinth and its mediating pathway.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
130
2
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 614 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
130
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Weak electrical stimulation of the contralateral vestibular nerve inhibits the spontaneous discharges of Type I neurons, whereas midline incisions which interrupt the commissural fibers from the contralateral labyrinth completely abolish such inhibition. These and other related experiments have led Shimazu and Precht (1966) to conclude that the increase in discharge rate of Type I vestibular neurons during ipsilateral rotation is in part the result of the withdrawal of contralateral labyrinthine inhibition. It could be argued that after unilateral labyrinthine lesion, the Type I neurons on the intact side could exhibit a degree of hypersensitivity to ipsilateral rotary stimulation as a result of the removal of contralateral inhibition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Weak electrical stimulation of the contralateral vestibular nerve inhibits the spontaneous discharges of Type I neurons, whereas midline incisions which interrupt the commissural fibers from the contralateral labyrinth completely abolish such inhibition. These and other related experiments have led Shimazu and Precht (1966) to conclude that the increase in discharge rate of Type I vestibular neurons during ipsilateral rotation is in part the result of the withdrawal of contralateral labyrinthine inhibition. It could be argued that after unilateral labyrinthine lesion, the Type I neurons on the intact side could exhibit a degree of hypersensitivity to ipsilateral rotary stimulation as a result of the removal of contralateral inhibition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…There is some neurophysiological evidence to support this assumption. Shimazu and Precht (1966) have shown that there are strong inhibitory influences on Type I vestibular neurons originating from the contralateral labyrinth. Type I neurons depolarize and hyperpolarize to ipsi-and contralateral rotation, respectively, and are considered to be major vestibular neurons because of their lower threshold to rotary stimulation (Precht, Shimazu, & Markham, 1966).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During active impulses, the VOR gain towards the non-adapting side also increased by ∼8 %, an increase ∼70 % less than the adapting side. This result might be due to changes in the signals carried by the inhibitory commissural vestibular pathways from the adapting side, which contribute to the non-adapting side response (McCrea et al 1981;Shimazu and Precht 1966). If the sensitivity of Type I neurons on the adapting side (medial vestibular nucleus (MVN); for horizontal VOR) is increased due to adaptation training, then their firing rate will be greater than normal during rotations to the adapting side, and presumably less than normal during rotations to the non-adapting side.…”
Section: Unilateral Incremental Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the fact that contralateral efferent responses were abolished by shallow midline lesions is hardly definitive. Besides crossing efferent axons (Lysakowski and Singer 2000), commissural fibers (Shimazu and Precht 1966) and possibly other fiber systems will be severed by such lesions.…”
Section: Efferent Actions Discharge Regularity and Neuroepithelial mentioning
confidence: 99%