The effect of visual-vestibular conflict on the latency of steady-state visually induced subjective rotation

Wong, Shaw-Chiang; Frost, Brian J.

doi:10.3758/bf03214278

Cited by 64 publications

(52 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Further, these results were consistent with features of visually induced self-motion (the simple "vection") and also the auditory vection, reported in many previous studies (e.g., Lee & Aronson, 1974;Johansson, 1977;Wong & Frost, 1981;Kano, 1991;Lackner, 1977;Riecke et al, 2005;Väljämae, 2009). …”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 79%

Self-Motion Perception Induced by Cutaneous Sensation Caused by Constant Wind

Murata¹,

Seno²,

Ozawa³

et al. 2014

PSYCH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We first in the history of vection research, challenged to induce cutaneous vection by providing the participants body with wind. Participants wore an eye mask to block out all outside visual information, and white noise was presented through a pair of earphones to block out all outside auditory information. We also provided body sway by using a horse-riding machine. The constant wind was provided to the participants from the front, side and behind of them. The results clearly showed that the cutaneous vection by wind was obtained in almost all participants. Even by only wind to the body could induce vection.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 79%

Self-Motion Perception Induced by Cutaneous Sensation Caused by Constant Wind

Murata¹,

Seno²,

Ozawa³

et al. 2014

PSYCH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, inertial cues of self-motion should help to reduce the onset latency of vection. It has indeed been shown that concordant inertial cues can speed up the onset of the illusion of self-rotation in a rotating optokinetic drum [14].…”

Section: Influence Of Visual and Inertial Cues On Self-motion And Selmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simulating believable forward accelerations on a stewart motion platform

Berger

Schulte-Pelkum

Bülthoff

2010

ACM Trans. Appl. Percept.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Here we present a study where human participants rated the believability of forward accelerations simulated with a hexapod motion platform equipped with a projection screen. Visual forward accelerations were presented together with brief forward surge translations and backwards pitches of the platform, and synchronous random up-down movements of the camera in the visual scene and the platform. The magnitudes of all of the parameters were varied independently across trials. Even though we found a high variability between participants, most believable simulation occured with strong visual accelerations combined with backwards pitches of the platform which approximately matched the visually simulated acceleration. This was contrary to a previous study, which had found most believable simulation when the platform movements simulated a much smaller acceleration than what was shown visually. Furthermore, surge translations increased believability if they qualitatively matched the magnitude of visual acceleration. The acceleration-deceleration profile of the surge translation and the magnitude and frequency range of the up-down movements had little effect on the believability. When strong visual acceleration cues were given, most participants reported trials as realistic even when the platform tilt rate was above thresholds for the vestibular canals reported in literature. These results can be used to optimize motion cueing algorithms for the simulation of linear accelerations in motion simulators.

show abstract

“…A number of recent studies suggest that such visually-mediated self-motion perceptions can be facilitated by physically moving the observer in a manner consistent with the visual simulation (Berger et al 2010;Wong and Frost 1981;Wright, 2009;Bubka and Bonato 2010) or by incorporating active head motions of the observer directly into the self-motion display (Ash et al 2011a;Ash et al 2011b). 1 When taken together, such findings suggest that consistent multisensory stimulation may produce a more compelling overall experience of self-motion than visual self-motion stimulation alone.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 79%

Walking without optic flow reduces subsequent vection

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This experiment investigated the effect of walking without optic flow on subsequent vection induction and strength. Two groups of participants walked for 5 min (either wearing Ganzfeld goggles or with normal vision) prior to exposure to a vection-inducing stimulus. We then measured the onset latency and strength of vection induced by a radially expanding pattern of optic flow. The results showed that walking without optic flow transiently yielded later vection onsets and reduced vection strength. We propose that walking without optic flow triggered a sensory readjustment, which reduced the ability of optic flow to induce self-motion perception.

show abstract

The effect of visual-vestibular conflict on the latency of steady-state visually induced subjective rotation

Cited by 64 publications

References 18 publications

Self-Motion Perception Induced by Cutaneous Sensation Caused by Constant Wind

Self-Motion Perception Induced by Cutaneous Sensation Caused by Constant Wind

Simulating believable forward accelerations on a stewart motion platform

Walking without optic flow reduces subsequent vection

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About