2014
DOI: 10.3109/0886022x.2014.884396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase prevents shock wave therapy induced renal injury

Abstract: Objectives: Shock wave lithotripsy treatment (SWT) is not completely free from side effects; one of the accused mechanisms for renal injury during SWT is oxygen-and nitrogen-derived free radical productions. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effect of inhibition of nitric oxide (NO) production by N-[3(aminomethyl) benzyl) acetamidine] (1400W), highly selective inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) inhibitor, at SWT-induced kidney damage. Materials and methods: Twenty-four rats those underwent right nephrect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Renal injury due to ESW is especially and intensively occurred in proximal tubulus as shown our histopathologic evaluation and our iNOS immunohistochemical staining in previous study. 16 Therefore, we assume that creatinine is secreted more than normally from proximal tubules in rats ESW procedure resulting in lower serum creatinine level. Another explanation for this situation may be related to different protein channels for each reabsorbed molecules and this needs further studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Renal injury due to ESW is especially and intensively occurred in proximal tubulus as shown our histopathologic evaluation and our iNOS immunohistochemical staining in previous study. 16 Therefore, we assume that creatinine is secreted more than normally from proximal tubules in rats ESW procedure resulting in lower serum creatinine level. Another explanation for this situation may be related to different protein channels for each reabsorbed molecules and this needs further studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applied the number of shock waves and the level of energy were decided based on previous studies and our preliminary studies. [14][15][16][17] After ESW procedure, rats were returned to their cages.…”
Section: Induction Of Esw-induced Renal Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Several clinical and experimental studies have reported that sound waves on the kidney cause damage to tissue in exposed kidney. 1,[5][6][7][8][9] Although the mechanism of renal injury after ESW is still not well-defined, more recently free oxygen radical production originating from transient ischemia due to ESW application has been considered to be an integral element in shock wave-induced renal damage. 7,10,11 Studies, measuring renal resistive index or followed renal blood velocity in the kidney subjected to SWT, showed that an increase in resistive index or a reduction in blood velocity indicative of vasoconstriction occurred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that this transient ischemia and following reperfusion causes release of cytokines/inflammatory cellular mediators, production of oxygen-derived free radicals and nitrogen-derived free radicals, and infiltration of tissue by inflammatory response cells, and this process initiates the cellular damage and death. 6,8,9,14 Moreover, many experimental studies have shown that renal injury following ESW can be prevented by antioxidant treatment modalities such as melatonin, coenzyme Q10, curcumin, and vitamin E; 5,6,14 the main purpose of these studies was to inhibit inflammatory reaction at the early phase so as to prevent renal damage. Our recent works also showed that SWT causes renal injury, especially at the proximal tubular system, and we demonstrated that this injury is due to excessive production of oxygen free radicals and nitric oxide (NO) production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation