1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1838(98)00051-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibitory NANC neurotransmission in choledocho–duodenal junction of rabbits—a possible role of PACAP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All patients (n = 42) fulfilled the following diagnostic criteria for probable MSA [5]: (1) progressive cerebellar ataxia and/or non- or poorly levodopa-responsive parkinsonism without evidence of a focal or nonfocal symptomatic origin of the disorder; (2) severe symptomatic autonomic failure with orthostatic hypotension and/or urinary incontinence not due to other causes; (3) absence of any neurodegenerative disorders in relatives and no evidence of consanguinity of parents, and (4) absence of dementia according to DSM-III-R (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychiatry, 1987) criteria, focal cortical dysfunction or predominant downgaze supranuclear palsy. Based on their clinical presentation, patients were subdivided into a group with predominant cerebellar symptoms (MSA-C, n = 28) at disease onset and another with predominant parkinsonian presentation (MSA-P, n = 14).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients (n = 42) fulfilled the following diagnostic criteria for probable MSA [5]: (1) progressive cerebellar ataxia and/or non- or poorly levodopa-responsive parkinsonism without evidence of a focal or nonfocal symptomatic origin of the disorder; (2) severe symptomatic autonomic failure with orthostatic hypotension and/or urinary incontinence not due to other causes; (3) absence of any neurodegenerative disorders in relatives and no evidence of consanguinity of parents, and (4) absence of dementia according to DSM-III-R (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychiatry, 1987) criteria, focal cortical dysfunction or predominant downgaze supranuclear palsy. Based on their clinical presentation, patients were subdivided into a group with predominant cerebellar symptoms (MSA-C, n = 28) at disease onset and another with predominant parkinsonian presentation (MSA-P, n = 14).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, we found that exogenous ATP also affects inhibitory neural pathways, involving nicotinic receptors and nitrergic nerves. In support of the presence of an inhibitory purinergic pathway in SO, an electrophysiological study using rabbit SO found ATP acting via P2X receptors, together with PACAP, to be involved in the NANC inhibitory junction potential [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Exogenous application of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) in vitro induced a relaxation in rabbit SO [10], inhibited spontaneous activity in cat SO [11], induced a noncholinergic contractile response in guinea pig SO [12], or had no effect in human SO [13]. Further electrophysiological investigations found desensitization of P2X receptors suppressed the nonadrenergic, noncholinergic (NANC) inhibitory junction potential, suggesting ATP was a transmitter involved in the NANC relaxation of rabbit SO [14]. A recent in vitro study using possum SO muscle rings found exogenous ATP induced a neurally mediated excitation followed by a tetrodotoxin (TTX)-insensitive inhibition of spontaneous contractions [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However in molluscs there are muscles (e.g. posterior jugalis, columellar and buccal retractor muscles of Helisoma) where no evidence for multineuronal innervation of individual muscle fibers was observed [40].…”
Section: Innervationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vertebrates PACAP modulates the effects of transmitters at inhibitory smooth muscle neuromuscular junctions, where it elicits relaxation by increasing adenylate cyclase activity or by controlling smooth muscle mechanical activity. It acts directly on muscle cells via PACAP receptors or indirectly by stimulating NO synthesis [40,61,90,104]. In order to determine whether the effect of PACAP was elicited through pre-and/or postsynaptic mechanisms on the FMs, the localization of PACAP and its receptors was assessed by immunohistochemistry.…”
Section: Synaptic Modulation Is Crucial For Spatial and Temporal Collmentioning
confidence: 99%