2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4371(01)00591-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhomogeneity and complexity measures for spatial patterns

Abstract: In this work, we examine two di erent measures for inhomogeneity and complexity that are derived from non-extensive considerations  a la Tsallis. Their performance is then tested on theoretically generated patterns. All measures are found to exhibit a most sensitive behaviour for Sierpinski carpets. The procedures here introduced provide us with new, powerful Tsallis' tools for analysing the inhomogeneity and complexity of spatial patterns.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, they are incapable of distinguishing structures that differ in their correlations over more than two variables, as we shall see below. Some recent work in this area, motivated in part by the need to characterize complex interfaces in surface science and geology [7,8,9,10,11,12,13], has suggested a set of approaches to these questions that are similar in spirit to fractal dimensions, in the sense that these approaches involve coarse-graining variables and then monitoring the changes that result as the coarse-graining scale is modulated. One can also use a multifractal approach, also known as the singularity spectrum, "f (α)", the thermodynamic formalism, and the fluctuation spectrum; for reviews, see, e.g., [14,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, they are incapable of distinguishing structures that differ in their correlations over more than two variables, as we shall see below. Some recent work in this area, motivated in part by the need to characterize complex interfaces in surface science and geology [7,8,9,10,11,12,13], has suggested a set of approaches to these questions that are similar in spirit to fractal dimensions, in the sense that these approaches involve coarse-graining variables and then monitoring the changes that result as the coarse-graining scale is modulated. One can also use a multifractal approach, also known as the singularity spectrum, "f (α)", the thermodynamic formalism, and the fluctuation spectrum; for reviews, see, e.g., [14,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantitative evaluation of the spatial inhomogeneity degree can be obtained using a simple entropic measure for finite sized objects (see [15] for binary patterns and [16] for grey-scale ones), its q-extensions à la Tsallis [17] is given in Refs. [18,19]. The modified entropic measure can be also widely applied to statistical reconstructions of complex grey-scale patterns [20] and prototypical three-dimensional microstructures [21] with the usage of the decomposable multiphase entropic descriptor [22].…”
Section: A Possible Correlation Between the Degrees Of Spatial Disordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this contribution, we will consider only maximum entropies corresponding to the equiprobable distribution, the simplest case. Piasecki et al [38] and Abe and Plastino [2] have already presented the generalization for some special cases of the Tsallis entropy, and Bickel [11] has used it to quantify fractal intermittency in biological time series.…”
Section: Extended Entropies and "Disorders" -Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%