1996
DOI: 10.1088/0268-1242/11/4/017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhomogeneous line broadening and the threshold current density of a semiconductor quantum dot laser

Abstract: Theoretical analysis of the gain and threshold current of a semiconductor quantum dot (QD) laser is given which takes account of the line broadening caused by fluctuations in quantum dot sizes. The following processes are taken into consideration together with the main process of radiative recombination of carriers in QDs: band-to-band radiative recombination of carriers in the waveguide region, carrier capture into QDs and thermally excited escape from QDs, photoexcitation of carriers from QDs to continuous-s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
167
0
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 307 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
167
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming a spontaneous emission rate much smaller than the capture and thermal escape processes ͑i.e., B e,h , C e,h ӷ 1͒, a stationary solution for the carrier dynamical evolution is obtained by enforcing the detailed balance condition J e,h g,e =0. 18 Inserting a quasiequilibrium Fermi distribution leads to the Kramer relation 19 linking the capture B e,h and the escape C e,h rates C e,h = B e,h exp͑− ⌬E e,h /k B T͒, ͑7͒…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming a spontaneous emission rate much smaller than the capture and thermal escape processes ͑i.e., B e,h , C e,h ӷ 1͒, a stationary solution for the carrier dynamical evolution is obtained by enforcing the detailed balance condition J e,h g,e =0. 18 Inserting a quasiequilibrium Fermi distribution leads to the Kramer relation 19 linking the capture B e,h and the escape C e,h rates C e,h = B e,h exp͑− ⌬E e,h /k B T͒, ͑7͒…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) and (4), v g is the group velocity of light, g max 1 is the maximum modal gain of ground-state lasing, 22 b ¼ (1/L) ln(1/R) is the mirror loss, and R is the facet reflectivity.…”
Section: Rate Equations Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3)] for spontaneous radiative recombination in the OCL and QDs, since this process is bimolecular. 22 We focus here on the effects of carrier capture into QDs and intradot relaxation on the lower-(ground-) state lasing, and, for this reason, we do not consider the stimulated emission via the upper (excited) state in QDs. To rule out the stimulated emission via the excited state in QDs, we set the maximum modal gain via excited-state transitions lower than the mirror loss b.…”
Section: Rate Equations Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where is the cross-section of carrier capture into a QD, is the carrier thermal velocity, is the spontaneous radiative lifetime in a QD given by (8) in [29], is the light velocity in vacuum, is the group index of the dispersive OCL material, is the surface density of QDs, is the QD layer area (the cross-section of the junction), is the QD layer width (the lateral size of the device), is the QD layer length (the cavity length), is the maximum (saturation) value of the modal gain spectrum peak (see [29] and (41) in [30]), is the number of photons in the lasing mode, is the OCL thickness, is the radiative constant for the OCL (given by (10) in [29]), is the injection-current density, is the mirror loss, is the facet reflectivity, and is the modal internal loss [see assumption 6) above].…”
Section: B Rate Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%