Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2556325.2567854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial experiences with small group discussions in MOOCs

Abstract: Peer learning, in which students discuss questions in small groups, has been widely reported to improve learning outcomes in traditional classroom settings. Classroom-based peer learning relies on students being in the same place at the same time to form peer discussion groups, but this is rarely true for online students in MOOCs. We built a software tool that facilitates chat-based peer learning in MOOCs by 1) automatically forming ad-hoc discussion groups and 2) scaffolding the interactions between students … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without the need to switch contexts to the discussion forum, learners may be more likely to ask questions or help others. Synchronous discussions embedded in lectures-asking students to work through a problem in small groups, then polling the room for potential answers, and finally explaining the right solution [Crouch and Mazur 2001;Smith et al 2009]-is one approach that has seen positive effects in classrooms and has been adapted successfully to MOOCs [Lim et al 2014]. More deeply incorporating social features into the presentation of instructional content could be leveraged to better support learning.…”
Section: Data-driven Design Choices For Open Online Learning Environmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without the need to switch contexts to the discussion forum, learners may be more likely to ask questions or help others. Synchronous discussions embedded in lectures-asking students to work through a problem in small groups, then polling the room for potential answers, and finally explaining the right solution [Crouch and Mazur 2001;Smith et al 2009]-is one approach that has seen positive effects in classrooms and has been adapted successfully to MOOCs [Lim et al 2014]. More deeply incorporating social features into the presentation of instructional content could be leveraged to better support learning.…”
Section: Data-driven Design Choices For Open Online Learning Environmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We surveyed sixteen learners in a programming-related MOOC [33] after an early "shake-out" deployment of the system to get subjective responses to the tool. 14 of 16 agreed or strongly agreed with the statement "I liked discussing questions in a small group and would like to do so again".…”
Section: Evidence Of Positive Reception In a Moocmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MOOCs offer educational opportunities for people who otherwise could not afford a formal education (Dillahunt, Wang, & Teasley, 2014). Unfortunately, MOOCs are also known for their high attrition rates (Ho et al, 2014;Lim, Coetzee, Hartmann, Fox, & Hearst, 2014;Malan, 2013). According to Liyanagunawardena, Adams, and Williams (2013), most MOOCs have a completion rate of less than 10%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%