1993
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.28.7.705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial Growth of Rosebay Rhododendron Seedlings as Influenced by Day and Night Temperatures

Abstract: Rosebay rhododendron (Rhododendron maximum L.) seedlings were grown in controlled-environment chambers for 14 weeks under long (9-hour) days at 18, 22, 26, or 30C in factorial combination with 15-hour nights at 14, 18, 22, or 26C. Total dry-matter production was lowest for 18C days and highest for 26C days. A similar response occurred for top, leaf, root, and stem dry weights. Nights at 22C maximized total plant, top, leaf, and stem dry weights. The optimum day/night cycle fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stem weight ratio was fairly constant over thermoperiods (data not presented). Similar responses have been noted for flame azalea (Malek et al, 1992a), mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia L.) (Malek et al, 1992b), and rosebay rhododendron (Starrett et al, 1993).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Stem weight ratio was fairly constant over thermoperiods (data not presented). Similar responses have been noted for flame azalea (Malek et al, 1992a), mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia L.) (Malek et al, 1992b), and rosebay rhododendron (Starrett et al, 1993).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The same response was observed in flame azalea (Malek et al, 1992a). However, Starrett et al (1993) reported that day temperature did not affect specific leaf area of rosebay rhododendron, but nights of 22 and 26C similarly reduced specific leaf area.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different from the hypothesis proposed by Peng et al (2004) that HNT increased biomass loss by enhancing respiration, our study concluded that HNT increased total biomass but LNT decreased the total, above-ground and below-ground biomass. Total biomass was stimulated by HNT in rice (Cheng et al, 2008, 2009), Ficus insipida and Ochroma pyramidale (Cheesman and Klaus, 2013), Rosebay rhododendron (Starrett et al, 1993), panicum (Patterson, 1990) and soybean (Hewitt et al, 1985). Studies in natural systems have seen impacts on plant phenological development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%