2009
DOI: 10.4137/ebo.s2320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial Implementation of a Comparative Data Analysis Ontology

Abstract: Abstract:Comparative analysis is used throughout biology. When entities under comparison (e.g. proteins, genomes, species) are related by descent, evolutionary theory provides a framework that, in principle, allows N-ary comparisons of entities, while controlling for non-independence due to relatedness. Powerful software tools exist for specialized applications of this approach, yet it remains under-utilized in the absence of a unifying informatics infrastructure. A key step in developing such an infrastructur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the data relationships shown, such as PHENOSCAPE:exhibits and those from CDAO (Comparative Data Analysis Ontology, [30]), are not explicit in Phenex. Instead, these are generated by the interpretation of NeXML documents within the Phenoscape Knowledgebase data loading software.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the data relationships shown, such as PHENOSCAPE:exhibits and those from CDAO (Comparative Data Analysis Ontology, [30]), are not explicit in Phenex. Instead, these are generated by the interpretation of NeXML documents within the Phenoscape Knowledgebase data loading software.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The OWL-formatted descriptive data were represented using terms from the Comparative Data Analysis Ontology (CDAO) (Prosdocimi et al 2009) and Darwin-SW, an ontology of Darwin Core terms (http://code.google.com/p/darwin-sw/ last accessed May 13, 2013). These data, along with ontologies listed in Table 1, were loaded into Protégé 4.1 (http://protege.stanford.edu/ last accessed May 13, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We searched repositories such as BioPortal [11], Ontobee [12] and AberOWL [13], and identified ontologies containing classes and properties for the entities identified in our analysis. This list of ontologies is described next: Comparative Data Analysis Ontology (CDAO) 1 [14]: Classes and properties relevant for evolutionary studies.Relations Ontology (RO) 2 [15]: Collection of biomedical properties to support standardization across biomedical ontologies.Homology Ontology (HOM) 3 [16]: Classes related to homology.Sequence Ontology (SO) 4 [17]: A set of classes and properties to define sequence features used in biological sequence annotation.Ontology of Genes and Genomes (OGG) 5 [18]: Classes and properties to represent relations among genes, genomes and organisms.Protein Ontology (PR) 6 [19]: Protein-related entities, including evolutionary relations between proteins.Semanticscience Integrated Ontology (SIO) 7 [20]: Classes and properties for rich description of biomedical objects and processes.NCBI Taxonomy (NCBIT) 8 [21]: Curated classification and nomenclature for all the organisms.Clusters of Orthologous Groups Analysis Ontology (CAO) 9 [22]: Classes to support the Clusters of Orthologous Groups enrichment method using Fisher’s exact test.…”
Section: Construction and Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative Data Analysis Ontology (CDAO) 1 [14]: Classes and properties relevant for evolutionary studies.…”
Section: Construction and Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%