2002
DOI: 10.1067/mpa.2002.129041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial nasolacrimal duct probing in children under age 5: Cure rate and factors affecting success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
65
1
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
65
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…4,12,16,24 However, as the natural history of spontaneous resolution is well recognised, 3,[7][8][9][10]13 it has been suggested that the decreasing success rate with increasing age is actually due to the process of natural selection, with cases of simple membranous obstruction at the distal NLD resolving, while more complex obstructions persist and accumulate in number. 25 This argument has been supported by a controlled study of probing vs observation during the second year of life, which identified that both are equally effective during this time (probing and observation resulted in the same outcome in children with epiphora between 1 and 2 years of age), but that the rate of spontaneous resolution/ probing success was lower than during the first year of life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4,12,16,24 However, as the natural history of spontaneous resolution is well recognised, 3,[7][8][9][10]13 it has been suggested that the decreasing success rate with increasing age is actually due to the process of natural selection, with cases of simple membranous obstruction at the distal NLD resolving, while more complex obstructions persist and accumulate in number. 25 This argument has been supported by a controlled study of probing vs observation during the second year of life, which identified that both are equally effective during this time (probing and observation resulted in the same outcome in children with epiphora between 1 and 2 years of age), but that the rate of spontaneous resolution/ probing success was lower than during the first year of life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other reports have suggested that the success rate of probing is dictated not by the age at probing, but by the type of obstruction. [13][14][15][16][17] Simple obstructions at the valve of Hasner are the most common, but more complex anomalies do exist, which may be less amenable to disruption by simple probing alone. Endoscopic-assisted probing facilitates visualisation of the probe in the membranous nasolacrimal duct and in the inferior meatus of the nose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Buna paralel olarak yaşın artmasıyla tedavi başarısının azaldığı dolayısıyla sondalamanın 3 yaş altındaki hastalara uygulanmasının uygun olacağı düşünülmüştür. 11,14,16,18 Bizim çalışmamızda da ilk sondalama başarısı 12-24 ay grubunda %80,95 iken 24 ay üzerindeki olgularda %44,44 olarak saptandı. Bu oranlar ülkemizden bildirilen çalışmalarla da benzerlik göstermektedir.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…24 İleri yaş, ağır tıkanıklık bulgularının varlığı, bilateral tıkanıklık, kanaliküler darlık, atonik kese, anatomik varyasyonlar ve non-membranöz DNKT sondalamada başarısızlık için risk faktörleridir. 8,14,18 Klinik olgularımızdan sondalama tedavisine cevap vermeyen hastaların önemli kısmında işlem esnasında kanaliküler darlık tespit edilmiştir.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Several studies have found a significant increase in the failure rate in those patients undergoing probing after the age of 12 months. (27,20,23,29,30) Table 5 shows the success rate of probing reported in several studies. Resolution of symptoms can also be attributed to spontaneous resolution in children less than one year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%