2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial site conditions and interactions between multiple drivers determine herb-layer changes over five decades in temperate forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Environmental changes such as shifts in land use, eutrophication, and climate change all influence forest vegetation (Gilliam 2016, Hedwall and Brunet 2016, Naaf and Kolk 2016. Modern intensive forestry has greatly altered landscape dynamics and ecosystem functions (Gilliam 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Environmental changes such as shifts in land use, eutrophication, and climate change all influence forest vegetation (Gilliam 2016, Hedwall and Brunet 2016, Naaf and Kolk 2016. Modern intensive forestry has greatly altered landscape dynamics and ecosystem functions (Gilliam 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Climate change, wildfire suppression, ungulate overabundance, drainage, and introduction of exotic species may also all contribute to vegetation changes in forests (Gilliam 2016). The importance and roles of these drivers, and their interactions, depend on factors such as the current forest management system (Chaudhary et al 2016), former forest use (Vellend et al 2007), and site conditions (Naaf and Kolk 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing soil resource availability will also favour species with higher EIV for fertility (EIV N ) (Naaf & Kolk, 2016). We might also expect no relationship between seed mass and changing resource conditions (Fortunel et al, 2009), and a unimodal response for species richness (Fraser et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings could be extrapolated to a large number of regions where environmental filtering is a poor determinant of plant distributions or where environmental conditions do not differ between recent and ancient forests (Brunet et al., ; De Frenne et al., ; Vellend et al., ; Verheyen, Fastenaekels, Vellend, De Keersmaeker, & Hermy, ; Verheyen et al., ). For species that are strongly limited by abiotic filtering, we could hypothesize that: (1) the convergence never occurs due to strong differences in abiotic conditions between ancient and post‐agricultural forests (Jacquemyn, Butaye, & Hermy, ; Rogers et al., ; Vellend, ), or (2) the convergence arises due to an homogenization of abiotic conditions over time (Baeten & Verheyen, ; Matlack, ; Naaf & Kolk, ). Investigating these hypotheses remains challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%