Initialisation and progression of the core reduction process at Donnemarie-Dontilly (Seine-et-Marne, France), site of the Belloisian tradition. New interpretative key for comparisons with contemporaneous industries and Federmesser-Gruppen assemblages

Abstract

At the Pleistocene-Holocene transition, a very widespread phenomenon of 'technical globalization' (Valentin, 2008) is proposed by certain archaeologists, based on the strong analogies existing between geographically distant lithic productions ([Epi-]Laborian, Belloisian, Ahrensburgian or even Swiderian). Therefore, it is necessary to develop criteria to evaluate the actual degree of relatedness between these diverse traditions, which, nevertheless, differ sometimes in their lithic projectile implements. Do real similarities with regard to the knapping methods exist, what do they consist of, and what do they indicate as to the precise characteristics of the intended blades and bladelets? Moreover, in what way are these methods and intentions distinct from what is known in the Late Federmesser-Gruppen (cf. Late Azilian)? In this paper, we start describing the modes of initialisation and progression of the core reduction process in the Belloisian industries by reexamining in detail the lithic material recovered at Donnemarie-Dontilly, the study of which benefits from numerous refit complexes. At the beginning of the paper, we use this opportunity to briefly make some new palaeoethnographical comments that ask anew which function these curious Belloisian sites had. In order to study the industry from Donnemarie, we then propose a rigorous technological vocabulary which distinguishes between initialisation and progression of the reduction process and which takes into consideration the extent and the orientation of this progression. One hundred and eleven successful knapping operations are analysed from this perspective, with the most reliable information originating from quite complete refit complexes or cores the initial volume of which can be reconstructed. Rare but very significant strictly 'facial' core reductions, clearly enlarged and dissymmetric progressions that no morphological limitation imposed, very flattened flaking faces during the last sequences are all significant options. They have sometimes been applied at the physical limits of blank detachment showing that the knappers often sought for particularly thin blades and bladelets (and with a tapered extremity, considering the frequent use of two platforms rapidly alternating). These options can also be found in the Belloisian assemblages of the Somme valley and of Normandy, which we have started to examine. Manifest affinities also exist with the Post-Azilian industries in western Central France, published by N. Naudinot (2010 and 2013): incidentally, it is these observations that have inspired us to reexamine the Belloisian from this particular perspective. From now on, the study has to be continued well beyond that among other related industries of the Pleistocene-Holocene transition. In these industries, we wonder now if, in addition to their distal tapering, it is not the very frequent overall thinness of the regular blades and bladelets that is discriminatory. This quality would be related with both the enlargement towards flat surfaces and often ve...

A quantitative analysis of Final Palaeolithic/earliest Mesolithic cultural taxonomy and evolution in Europe

“…The 'Flat Blade and Bladelet Technocomplex' (FBT) recently proposed based on technological studies [67][68][69] is a good illustration of this difficulty. In defining the FBT, emphasis is placed on widely shared blade core architectures with low longitudinal and transversal convexities aimed at obtaining flat blades, a characteristic originally ascribed to the Laborian and later recognized in the Belloisian [70], the Long Blade Industries [71], as well as possibly in Ahrensburgian [72] and some Maglemosean contexts [73]. Naudinot et al [74] regard the FBT as a near-continental unit, spanning large parts of northern Europe.…”

La séquence gravettienne de Belgique : mise à jour et mises au point

“…Le schéma le plus fréquent induit l'exploitation préférentielle d'une des faces les plus larges des nucléus à partir de deux plans de frappe opposés non hiérarchisés. Sa mise en oeuvre repose sur une phase d'initialisation à progression dissymétrique (Valentin et al 2014), effectuée à partir d'une crête aménagée sur une face étroite du bloc (Touzé 2018). Le débitage est mené à la pierre au moyen de percussions effectuées le plus souvent à proximité du bord du plan de frappe (stigmates de la percussion tendre minérale ; Pelegrin 2000), mais très fréquemment aussi en retrait de ce dernier (stigmates s'apparentant à ceux de la percussion dure ; Pelegrin 2000).…”

“…à partir de deux plans de frappe opposés, ce qui, conjointement avec le détachement de lames exploitant plus de la moitié de la longueur de table disponible, permet de conserver une carène peu marquée et favorise l'obtention de supports au profil rectiligne. Les rares indications relatives à la progression du débitage montrent que celle-ci s'opère plutôt de manière symétrique(Valentin et al 2014) à partir d'une des faces étroites du bloc, du moins lorsque celui-ci présente des faces de largeurs inégales.…”

Western visitors at the Blätterhöhle (city of Hagen, southern Westphalia) during the Younger Dryas? A new final palaeolithic assemblage type in western Germany

“…To the west of the distribution area with typical inventories of the Ahrensburgian, lithic inventories were identified about 40 years ago, which are particularly worthy of note due to large blades, a bipolar knapping method for large cores, oversized blades with severe edge damage (bruised blades) and often heterogeneous or variable projectile point types [ 2 , 54 , 55 ]. These long-blade industries –or the Belloisien–are derived from the Ahrensburgian (and recently re-assigned as Épi-Ahrensbourgien by French colleagues [ 56 ]).…”