2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initiation and growth of damage in a dual-phase steel observed by X-ray microtomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
155
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
9
155
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…13) Weck et al 6) analyzed the void growth in copper and Glidcop containing artificial array of holes oriented at an arbitrary angle to the tensile axis and demonstrated that the RT model gives good predictions for growth of quasi-spherical voids with stress triaxiality variation. Bouaziz et al 16) and Marie et al 10) proposed the modification of the RT model in order to account for mismatch between the prediction and the experimental measurement resulted from nucleation at high strain regime. The RT model was later revised by Huang 17) in order to extend the approach to low values of stress triaxiality.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…13) Weck et al 6) analyzed the void growth in copper and Glidcop containing artificial array of holes oriented at an arbitrary angle to the tensile axis and demonstrated that the RT model gives good predictions for growth of quasi-spherical voids with stress triaxiality variation. Bouaziz et al 16) and Marie et al 10) proposed the modification of the RT model in order to account for mismatch between the prediction and the experimental measurement resulted from nucleation at high strain regime. The RT model was later revised by Huang 17) in order to extend the approach to low values of stress triaxiality.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often used in the tomographic study as a first-order estimation of the triaxiality regardless of the specimen geometries, e.g., cylindrical bars, 5,8,12,18) flat ones, 6,7,9,10,13,19,20) even at notched ones. 5,8,13,18,20) The Bridgman formula, however, is only valid for an axisymmetric geometry.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations