Injuries in French and Chinese regular badminton players

Herbaut, Alexis; Delannoy, J; Foissac, Matthieu

doi:10.1016/j.scispo.2018.02.001

Cited by 20 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In competitive badminton, players are required to perform rapid lunges and jumps in multiple directions in response to the opponent’s action and immediately return to the central position to prepare for the next movement, 14 , 39 making the ankle one of the sites that is most prone to injuries. 20 , 24 , 29 Most ankle injuries are sprains 22 and put players at risk of long-term consequences, including reinjury, instability, and prolonged symptoms. 4 , 9 , 28 , 36 Although a number of studies have investigated the short-term and long-term outcomes related to ankle injuries, most of them have focused on the significant recurrent risk.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Ankle Injury on Subsequent Ankle, Knee, and Shoulder Injuries in Competitive Badminton Players Younger Than 13 Years

Liu

Imai

Zhou

et al. 2022

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: In recent years, there has been a trend in badminton toward more specialized training at an earlier age. Accompanying this trend is the increased frequency of injuries in young players. Ankle injury is the most common injury in pediatric sports; however, its influence on subsequent injuries is rarely considered. Purposes: To evaluate the incidence of ankle, knee, and shoulder injuries in youth badminton and to investigate the influence of ankle injuries on subsequent ankle, knee, and shoulder injuries. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A custom-designed questionnaire was used to survey Japanese players 7 to 12 years of age who attended national elementary school–level badminton tournaments between May and September 2019. Information including the players’ characteristics, training history, injuries in the previous 12 months, and ankle injury histories were collected. Logistic regression was used for analysis. Results: A total of 478 players were included in the study, with 71 ankle injuries, 74 knee injuries, and 48 shoulder injuries reported. The injury incidence rates (per 1000 hours of play) were 0.23 (95% CI, 0.18-0.29) for the ankle, 0.24 (95% CI, 0.19-0.30) for the knee, and 0.16 (95% CI, 0.11-0.20) for the shoulder; 90.1% of ankle injuries, 25.7% of knee injuries, and 33.3% of shoulder injuries were acute. Previous ankle injury was significantly associated with subsequent ankle injury (adjusted Odds Ratio (OR), 3.05; 95% CI, 1.54-6.07; P < .05), knee injury (adjusted OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.12-3.69; P < .05), and shoulder injury (adjusted OR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.26-4.83; P < .05). Conclusion: The study results indicated that previous injury to the ankle significantly increased the occurrence of subsequent ankle, knee, and shoulder injuries. Emphasizing protection and prevention of ankle injuries may help lower future injury risk in young badminton players.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Ankle Injury on Subsequent Ankle, Knee, and Shoulder Injuries in Competitive Badminton Players Younger Than 13 Years

Liu

Imai

Zhou

et al. 2022

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This problem occurred in the unskilled player group so that it can be related to the kinetic chain movement theory principle when the movement is not harmonious. It indicates that any disturbance in the kinetic motion chain caused by improper mechanics could result in an overload upper limb joint, resulting in a lack of coordination of the appropriate motion sequences (Herbaut et al, 2018).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Kinetics Analysis of Overhead Standing Smash in Badminton

Rusdiana

Subarjah

Badruzaman

et al. 2021

J. pendidik. jasmani olahraga

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to analyze the joint motion kinetics of the shoulders, elbows, and wrists between experienced player (skilled player) group and unskilled player group when performing overhead standing smash in badminton game. The samples involved were 26 samples. The samples included 13 male badminton players joining Student Activity Unit who had achieved many achievements and had a high skill (skilled), while the other 13 samples were unskilled players, involving students who had just studied under one year. The mean of participants’ age was 19.4 ± 1.6 years, height was 1.73 ± 0.12m, and body weight was 62.8 ± 3.7kg. This study used 3 Panasonic Handycams, a calibration set, 3D Frame DIAZ IV motion analysis software, and a speed radar gun. Normalization of the kinetic motion score of the shoulder, elbow, and wrist joints was calculated using the inverse dynamics method. The t-test was used to determine the significance of motion kinetic difference of the two different groups. The results presented that the shuttlecock speed of the skilled player group, during the overhead standing smash, showed a significant difference. Meanwhile, the joint motion of the inferior shoulder force, shoulder anterior force, shoulder internal rotation torque, shoulder horizontal abduction torque, elbow anterior force, and wrist flexion torque were higher in the skilled players group than the unskilled player group.

show abstract

“…The impact during lunge represents another source of injury, particularly during the intensive lunge in which the Achilles tendon and the patella tendon are loaded six to 12 times, and five times body weight, respectively (Lee & Yoo, 2012). Compared to amateur athletes, a lower incidence of injury was found among professional athletes, which could be explained by smaller peak horizontal GRF and loading rates (Herbaut, Delannoy & Foissac, 2018;Lam et al, 2017). Through the adaption of different techniques and preferred movement paths, athletes quickly adjusted movement mechanics to dissipate stresses and accommodate impact and other abrupt conditions (Huang et al, 2014;Lam, Ding & Qu, 2017;Lin et al, 2016).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Professional players should lunge and reach the shuttlecock at the best position quickly and maintain balance with skillful and stable footwork ( Chin et al, 1995 ; Hong et al, 2014 ). However, the demanding footwork could also result in high injury risks at knee and ankle joints, with incidence rates from 63% up to 92% ( Herbaut, Delannoy & Foissac, 2018 ). Players could experience impact load as high as 2.5 times of the body weight and require sufficiently high muscle activities to stabilize lower extremities joint during a lunge ( Phomsoupha & Laffaye, 2015 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biomechanics of lower limb in badminton lunge: a systematic scoping review

Lam

Wong

Lee

2020

PeerJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Badminton is a popular sport activity in both recreational and elite levels. A lot of biomechanical studies have investigated badminton lunge, since good lunge performance may increase the chances to win the game. This review summarized the current trends, research methods, and parameters-of-interest concerning lower-extremity biomechanics in badminton lunges. Methodology Databases including Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and PubMed were searched from the oldest available date to September 2020. Two independent authors screened all the articles and 20 articles were eligible for further review. The reviewed articles compared the differences among playing levels, footwear designs, and lunge directions/variations, using parameters including ground reaction forces, plantar pressure distribution, kinematics, and kinetics. Results Elite badminton players demonstrated higher impact attenuation capability, more aggressive knee and ankle strategy (higher mechanical moment), and higher medial plantar load than amateur players. Footwear modifications can influence comfort perception and movement mechanics, but it remains inconclusive regarding how these may link with lunging performance. Contradicting findings in kinematics is possibly due to the variations in lunge and instructions. Conclusions Playing levels and shoe designs have significant effects on biomechanics in badminton lunges. Future studies can consider to use an unanticipated testing protocol and realistic movement intensity. They can study the inter-limb coordination as well as the contributions and interactions of intrinsic and extrinsic factors to injury risk. Furthermore, current findings can stimulate further research studying whether some specific footwear materials with structural design could potentially compromise impact attenuation, proprioception, and performance.

show abstract

Injuries in French and Chinese regular badminton players

Cited by 20 publications

References 24 publications

Influence of Ankle Injury on Subsequent Ankle, Knee, and Shoulder Injuries in Competitive Badminton Players Younger Than 13 Years

Influence of Ankle Injury on Subsequent Ankle, Knee, and Shoulder Injuries in Competitive Badminton Players Younger Than 13 Years

Kinetics Analysis of Overhead Standing Smash in Badminton

Biomechanics of lower limb in badminton lunge: a systematic scoping review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About