2016
DOI: 10.1177/1088767916671350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Injury Patterns for Homicide Followed by Suicide by the Relationship Between Victims and Offenders

Abstract: The connection between the victim–offender relationship and injury patterns has been established in the lethal violence literature; however, this association has not been explored in the study of homicide followed by the perpetrator’s suicide. Using data from the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS), we address this research gap by examining violence inflicted on 1,718 homicide–suicide victims that occurred between 2003 and 2013. Results show some support for variation in injury across intimacy and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moving forward, responses to homicide-suicide should be grounded in theory and rigorous empiricism, rather than in public fear and sensationalism. Unfortunately, much of the research on homicide-suicide is: atheoretical; qualitative; descriptive; limited to small samples; and conducted almost exclusively at the individual level, without regard for contextual effects (Eliason 2009; Flynn et al 2009; Liem, Postulart, and Nieuwbeerta 2009; Panczak et al 2013; Reckdenwald and Simone 2017). While descriptive statistics from small samples that do not account for the broader social context can reveal important patterns, they are not sufficient for revealing effects net of control variables or generalizing findings from a sample to a larger population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving forward, responses to homicide-suicide should be grounded in theory and rigorous empiricism, rather than in public fear and sensationalism. Unfortunately, much of the research on homicide-suicide is: atheoretical; qualitative; descriptive; limited to small samples; and conducted almost exclusively at the individual level, without regard for contextual effects (Eliason 2009; Flynn et al 2009; Liem, Postulart, and Nieuwbeerta 2009; Panczak et al 2013; Reckdenwald and Simone 2017). While descriptive statistics from small samples that do not account for the broader social context can reveal important patterns, they are not sufficient for revealing effects net of control variables or generalizing findings from a sample to a larger population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it has been shown that in the case of perpetrators who previously knew their victims, there tends to be a greater number and seriousness of injuries [41], with the homicides tending to take place indoors and most often using bladed weapons or blunt objects [32,42]. In addition, they tend to be triggered by an argument [33,43]; similarly, the victims are usually male and between the ages of 15 and 24 [44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, homicide-suicide has no formal legal definition (because charges are not typically filed) and weak theoretical grounding on which few empirical tests are based (Liem, 2010;Riedel, 2010). As a result, much of the extant research on homicide followed by suicide is epidemiological in nature; has been focused on descriptions of isolated events rather than on scientific assessment of larger sampling frames; has examined whether homicide-suicide is primarily suicide driven, primarily homicide driven, or a different form of violence entirely; and has produced mixed results (Eliason, 2009;Flynn et al, 2009;Liem, Postulart, & Nieuwbeerta, 2009;McPhedran et al, 2015;Panczak et al, 2013;Reckdenwald & Simone, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%