SAE Technical Paper Series 1997
DOI: 10.4271/973309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Injury Risks, Misuse Rates and the Effect of Misuse Depending on the Kind of Child Restraint System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Janssen et al (1992) reported that misusing the lap/sash belt by placing the sash under the armpit and/or behind the back resulted in greater potential for head impacts with the vehicle interior, for both adult and child dummies. Hummel et al (1997) found similar results for sash belt misuse in booster seats.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Janssen et al (1992) reported that misusing the lap/sash belt by placing the sash under the armpit and/or behind the back resulted in greater potential for head impacts with the vehicle interior, for both adult and child dummies. Hummel et al (1997) found similar results for sash belt misuse in booster seats.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…No reconstructions involving forward-facing child restraint systems were attempted. Lalande et al (2003) and Hummel et al (1997) have reported identifiable differences in dummy output in forwardfacing restraints under varying restraint misuse configurations. In the work reported by Lalande et al (2003) there were overall degradations in the level of protection provided in cases of misuse compared to correct use, and the Hybrid III 3-year-old was used in this test series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a recent comprehensive report summarizing 82,000 child restraint checks in 1 year, Safe Kids reports that 44% of parents left the fitting appointment with a different car seat than the one they used on arrival (Safe Kids USA, 2011). Thus, one of the primary aims of injury control efforts is to increase the rates of correct, age-appropriate child safety seat use for children (Hummel et al, 1997). The CDC National Action Plan for child injury prevention highlights the need for more interdisciplinary research to further determine why caregivers do not always appropriately restrain their children and encourages researchers to identify effective strategies for targeting audiences using relevant channels (CDC, NCIPC, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevant accident statistics show that child who takes the rear seats and uses restraint system can effectively ensure the safety [2] [3] [4] and its safety is far more than that of by only using three-point adult seat belts [5]; the child who only use adult seat belts are more likely to be damaged on the head and neck in traffic accidents [6]; moreover, the severe injury rate of the child passengers using the restraint system can be reduced to 77% than those who are not protected [7]. A large number of accident data show that the child's head is primarily protected, followed by chest and abdomen [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%