Inkjet Printing for Biofabrication

Li, Xinda; Chen, Jianwei; Liu, Boxun; Wang, Xiong; Ren, Dongni; Xu, Tao

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40498-1_26-1

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 65 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the local temperature of the ink can increase up to 300 °C for a few microseconds, which could limit material types to the ones resistant to thermal degradation. 343 In contrast, piezoelectric bioprinters are relatively expensive but compatible with a wider range of materials without any of the risks caused by high temperature compared with thermal bioprinters. For bioprinting cell-laden constructs, both bioprinters have been extensively utilized.…”

Section: D Deposition Bioprintingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Guiding Lights: Tissue Bioprinting Using Photoactivated Materials

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Photo-activated materials have found widespread use in biological and medical applications and are playing an increasingly important role in the nascent field of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting. Light can be used as a trigger to drive the formation or the degradation of chemical bonds, leading to unprecedented spatiotemporal control over a material's chemical, physical, and biological properties. With resolution and construct size ranging from nanometres to centimeters, light-mediated biofabrication allows multicellular and multimaterial approaches. It promises to be a powerful tool to mimic the complex multiscale organization of living tissues including skin, bone, cartilage, muscle, vessels, heart, and liver, among others, with increasing organotypic functionality. With this review, we comprehensively discuss photochemical reactions, photo-activated materials, and their use in state-of-the-art deposition-based (extrusion and droplet) and vat polymerization-based (one-and two-photon) bioprinting. By offering an up-to-date view on these techniques, we identify emerging trends, focusing on both the chemistry and instrument aspects, thereby allowing the readers to select the best-suited approach. Starting with photochemical reactions and photo-activated materials, we then discuss principles, applications, and limitations of each technique. With a critical eye to the most recent achievements, the reader is guided through this exciting, emerging field with special emphasis on cell-laden hydrogel constructs.

show abstract

Section: D Deposition Bioprintingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Guiding Lights: Tissue Bioprinting Using Photoactivated Materials

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Considering the driving forces needed for cell deposition, there are three methods of pressure generation in drop-on-demand technique, i.e. thermal, piezoelectric and electrostatic [16,17]. The advantages of inkjet-based bioprinting are cost-effective, relatively fine resolution and high velocity of cell dissemination.…”

Section: Steps In the Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

3D skin bioprinting: future potential for skin regeneration

Pasierb¹,

Jezierska²,

Karpuk³

et al. 2022

pdia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Skin provides protection against external agents and plays an essential role in maintaining the body homeostasis. Bioprinting as a novel strategy involves computer-controlled deposition of cells and scaffolds into a three-dimensional (3D) construction of skin. 3D bioprinting gives an opportunity to generate multi-layered vascularized skin grafts that can overcome the limitations of current skin substitutes. The main indication is treatment of troublesome wounds, especially severe burns and non-healing chronic lesions. Bioprinted skin equivalents offer a promising approach in the field of regenerative medicine. This review presents and discusses 3D skin construct formation, its limitations and modifications, and its usefulness.

show abstract

“…There was around an 80 to 95% yield in the cells printed from warm, piezoelectric, and electrostatic inkjet bioprinting strategy, affirming high cell reasonability. [29][30][31] Expulsion of the voltage beat takes the pressing factor plate back to its unique shape shooting a bio-ink bead. Inkjet bioprinting procedures show guarantee as they give high-goal printing because of its fine command over the launch of beads and pico-liter estimated ink drops.…”

Section: Droplet-based Bioprintingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recent Utilization of 3D-Bioprinting Methods for Breast Cancer Models

Mounika¹,

Ganpisetti²,

Giribabu³

et al. 2022

JYP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Animal models are the most commonly used model that helps to improve the understanding of the genetic alterations that occur in humans during the carcinogenic environment. Furthermore, these models play a pivotal role in the illustration of tumorigenesis and therapeutic strategies. With the advancement in molecular biology, the use of nanomedicine for breast cancer treatment has progressed, and more is expected to be done in the future pretrial and clinical models to achieve more success. The biocompatibility of 3D printing platforms has been reported to be adequate in terms of cell viability; however the effects on gene expression and functional aspects have received less attention. Various mechanical and visual disruptions to cells are involved depending on the type of bioprinter employed. Additional research into the mechanical and optical effects of the bioprinting process will provide more insight into the 3D printing technique' biocompatibility. To investigate the microenvironment of breast tumours and 3D bioprinting methods have also been studied. Modalities for bioprinting include extrusion-based (EBB) printing, droplet-based (DBB) printing and laser-based bioprinting. Different research has indicated that new developments of novel cancer modelling have emerged with 3D bioprinting technology. Those studies need to be properly explained and analyses in a Broadway in this review and to help in the progress of cancer research.

show abstract

Inkjet Printing for Biofabrication

Cited by 6 publications

References 65 publications

Guiding Lights: Tissue Bioprinting Using Photoactivated Materials

Guiding Lights: Tissue Bioprinting Using Photoactivated Materials

3D skin bioprinting: future potential for skin regeneration

Recent Utilization of 3D-Bioprinting Methods for Breast Cancer Models

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About