2015
DOI: 10.1097/qai.0000000000000470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innate Activation of MDC and NK Cells in High-Risk HIV-1–Exposed Seronegative IV-Drug Users Who Share Needles When Compared With Low-Risk Nonsharing IV-Drug User Controls

Abstract: Background Previous studies have described increased innate immune activation in HIV-1 exposed, sero-negative intra-venous drug users (HESN-IDU), but have not addressed the independent role of injected drugs and/or repeated injections in driving immune activation. Methods Here, we investigated innate (NK cells and dendritic cells) and adaptive (HIV-specific antibody and CD8+ T cell) immune parameters among a high-risk cohort of needle-sharing HESN-IDU subjects and compared them to low-risk non-sharing IDU su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
16
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sharing of injection equipment (needles and paraphernalia) was not significantly related to the immune activation markers studied. While this differs from the results reported by Tomescu et al 3 this discrepancy may be attributed to the many differences between the studies. For example, Tomescu looked at NK cells, while our analysis used T cells; our analysis controlled for HCV viremia; and there were differences in the characteristics of the participants recruited (e.g., frequency of injection was lower in the Tomescu study- about once per day compared with an average of over 5 times per day in our sample).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sharing of injection equipment (needles and paraphernalia) was not significantly related to the immune activation markers studied. While this differs from the results reported by Tomescu et al 3 this discrepancy may be attributed to the many differences between the studies. For example, Tomescu looked at NK cells, while our analysis used T cells; our analysis controlled for HCV viremia; and there were differences in the characteristics of the participants recruited (e.g., frequency of injection was lower in the Tomescu study- about once per day compared with an average of over 5 times per day in our sample).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Increasing our understanding of the factors contributing to this heightened immune activation, which has been associated with progression of chronic disease and disability, 5,6 can lead to better health outcomes for PWID.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, that a state of protection is also associated with adaptive immune quiescence [ 39 ] would be consistent with our findings that PHA and IL-2 supplementation in the IMDM cultures blocked HERV-K102 particle production (data not shown). The contribution of repeated exposures presumably to other pathogens, is reminiscent of the findings reported in injection drug use HESN, where it has been shown protection related to the sharing of needles and the stimulation of innate immunity [ 41 ] and is consistent with our work showing various viruses stimulate HERV-K102 particle production in vivo [ 3 ]. Interestingly, more recent evidence in the Nairobi cohort has shown Mx2 expression, which inhibits HIV-1 integration, was associated with medroxyprogesterone use and the latter was associated with protection against HIV-1 transmission [ 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Overall, the immune profile of high-risk populations is poorly resolved, although increased immune activation has been observed in high-risk men who have sex with men (MSM) 3,4 and injection drug users. [5][6][7] Immune activation, particularly increases in activated CD4 T cells, may increase susceptibility to HIV by providing additional viral targets or facilitating rapid viral dissemination. It is becoming increasingly evident that variations in the subtle qualitative aspects of the humoral HIV vaccine response may influence its efficacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%