2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cimid.2009.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innate immune responses of primary murine macrophage-lineage cells and RAW 264.7 cells to ligands of Toll-like receptors 2, 3, and 4

Abstract: Although studies have been performed to characterize responses of macrophages from individual anatomical sites (e.g., alveolar macrophages) or of murine-derived macrophage cell lines to microbial ligands, few studies compare these cell types in terms of phenotype and function. We directly compared the expression of cell surface markers and functional responses of primary cultures of three commonly used cells of monocyte-macrophage lineage (splenic macrophages, bone-marrow derived macrophages, and bone-marrow d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
111
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
8
111
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, complementary in vitro and in vivo investigations using primary cells activated by risperidone and haloperidol should be performed in order to confirm the results described here. Although RAW 264.7 cell line displays some phenotypes similar to primary cells, there are some notable differences, including differential gene expression (Berghaus et al 2010). Another limitation of our study stems from a small number of drug concentrations tested here, excluding concentrations similar to those found in plasma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…However, complementary in vitro and in vivo investigations using primary cells activated by risperidone and haloperidol should be performed in order to confirm the results described here. Although RAW 264.7 cell line displays some phenotypes similar to primary cells, there are some notable differences, including differential gene expression (Berghaus et al 2010). Another limitation of our study stems from a small number of drug concentrations tested here, excluding concentrations similar to those found in plasma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…BMMΦ and IC-21 cells continued to up-regulate expression of maturation markers CD14 and F4/80, and CD14 and Fc, respectively (Figure 4 and Table 2), over 21 days, reflecting progressively distinct differentiation state [35, 48, 55]. Another study, also comparing variations between different macrophage sources, identified unique external receptor expression by each macrophage type [40]. However, consistent with our findings, this identified similarly high CD14 expression by BMMΦ and RAW cells compared to the other cell lines compared [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MHC I and II mean fluorescent brightness values were also determined as a further check of the purity of each cell type. The gating and assessment of fluorescence was carried out using Accuri analysis software (Accuri Cytometers) as previously described (38).…”
Section: Tlr5 Flow Cytometrymentioning
confidence: 99%