2017
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inner centromere localization of the CPC maintains centromere cohesion and allows mitotic checkpoint silencing

Abstract: Faithful chromosome segregation during mitosis requires that the kinetochores of all sister chromatids become stably connected to microtubules derived from opposite spindle poles. How stable chromosome bi-orientation is accomplished and coordinated with anaphase onset remains incompletely understood. Here we show that stable chromosome bi-orientation requires inner centromere localization of the non-enzymatic subunits of the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) to maintain centromeric cohesion. Precise inner ce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

11
75
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
11
75
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent work has demonstrated that non-centromeric CPC results in weakened centromeric cohesion in human cells (Hengeveld et al, 2017), in accordance with previous reports that the CPC regulates centromeric cohesion (Marston, 2015). Interestingly, studies in budding yeast have shown that the inner kinetochore enriches centromeric cohesion by recruiting the cohesin loader complex (Fernius et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Recent work has demonstrated that non-centromeric CPC results in weakened centromeric cohesion in human cells (Hengeveld et al, 2017), in accordance with previous reports that the CPC regulates centromeric cohesion (Marston, 2015). Interestingly, studies in budding yeast have shown that the inner kinetochore enriches centromeric cohesion by recruiting the cohesin loader complex (Fernius et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In metaphase cells, where centromeres are stretched, the tethered HP1a split into two peaks that tracked the separating kinetochores, while untethered EY-HP1a remained as a single, somewhat broader, peak in the inner centromere ( Fig EV1B). The tethered CB-EY-HP1a remained 0.2-0.3 lm internal to the peak of CENP-C, suggesting that it occupies a kinetochore-proximal domain, as previously described for CB-INCENP (Liu et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2011;Hengeveld et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Ipl1, Sli15, Bir1 and COMA are conserved from yeast to vertebrates and their vertebrate counterparts are called Aurora B, INCENP, Survivin and CENP-O/P/Q/U, respectively [13,38]. Crucially, it was recently reported that INCENP lacking its Survivin-binding domain (N-terminus) still supports bi-orientation in human cells [39], as does yeast Sli15 lacking its N-terminus [14]. If mechanisms are conserved between yeast and vertebrate cells, CENP-O/P/Q/R would promote recruitment of Aurora B-INCENP to inner kinetochores independently of Survivin to support error correction in vertebrate cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%