Successful cell division requires that chromosomes attach to opposite poles of the mitotic spindle (bi-orientation). Aurora B kinase regulates chromosome-spindle attachments by phosphorylating kinetochore substrates that bind microtubules. Centromere tension stabilizes bi-oriented attachments, but how physical forces are translated into signaling at individual centromeres is unknown. Using FRET-based biosensors to measure localized phosphorylation dynamics in living cells, we found that phosphorylation of an Aurora B substrate at the kinetochore depended on its distance from the kinase at the inner centromere. Furthermore, repositioning Aurora B closer to the kinetochore prevented stabilization of bi-oriented attachments and activated the spindle checkpoint. Thus, centromere tension can be sensed by increased spatial separation of Aurora B from kinetochore substrates, which reduces phosphorylation and stabilizes kinetochore microtubules.Accurate chromosome segregation during cell division is essential to maintain genome integrity. Prior to segregation, kinetochores of sister chromatids attach to microtubules from opposite spindle poles (bi-orientation). This configuration is achieved through a trial-and-error process in which correct attachments exert tension across the centromere, which stabilizes kinetochore-microtubule interactions. Incorrect attachments, for example if both sister chromatids attach to a single spindle pole, exert less tension and are destabilized, providing a new opportunity to bi-orient (1,2). How tension is coupled to kinetochore-microtubule stability is not known.The mitotic kinase Aurora B (Ipl1 in budding yeast) localizes to the inner centromere, between sister kinetochores, and destabilizes microtubule attachments by phosphorylating kinetochore substrates, including Dam1 and the Ndc80 complex (3-10). An appealing model is that Aurora B substrates are selectively phosphorylated at incorrect attachments. To test this model we first examined phosphorylation of CENP-A Ser-7, a known kinetochore substrate (11). We used an assay in which Aurora B inhibition leads to a high frequency of syntelic attachment errors, with sister chromatids connected to a single spindle pole (6) (Fig. S1A). We compared phospho-CENP-A staining at correct and incorrect attachments 10 min after removing the reversible Aurora B kinase inhibitor ZM447439 (12), which re-activates Aurora B. Phospho-** Publisher's Disclaimer: This manuscript has been accepted for publication in Science. This version has not undergone final editing.Please refer to the complete version of record at http://www.sciencemag.org/. The manuscript may not be reproduced or used in any manner that does not fall within the fair use provisions of the

Aurora B kinase is essential for faithful chromosome segregation during mitosis. During (pro)metaphase, Aurora B is concentrated at the inner centromere by the kinases Haspin and Bub1. However, how Haspin and Bub1 collaborate to control Aurora B activity at centromeres remains unclear. Here, we show that either Haspin or Bub1 activity is sufficient to recruit Aurora B to a distinct chromosomal locus. Moreover, we identified a small, Bub1 kinase–dependent Aurora B pool that supported faithful chromosome segregation in otherwise unchallenged cells. Joined inhibition of Haspin and Bub1 activities fully abolished Aurora B accumulation at centromeres. While this impaired the correction of erroneous KT–MT attachments, it did not compromise the mitotic checkpoint, nor the phosphorylation of the Aurora B kinetochore substrates Hec1, Dsn1, and Knl1. This suggests that Aurora B substrates at the kinetochore are not phosphorylated by centromere-localized pools of Aurora B, and calls for a reevaluation of the current spatial models for how tension affects Aurora B–dependent kinetochore phosphorylation.

The chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) is a critical regulator of chromosome segregation during mitosis by correcting nonbipolar microtubule-kinetochore interactions. By severing these interactions, the CPC is thought to create unattached kinetochores that are subsequently sensed by the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) to prevent premature mitotic exit. We now show that spindle checkpoint function of the CPC and its role in eliminating nonbipolar attachments can be uncoupled. Replacing the chromosomal passenger protein INCENP with a mutant allele that lacks its coiled-coil domain results in an overt defect in a SAC-mediated mitotic arrest in response to taxol treatment, indicating that this domain is critical for CPC function in spindle checkpoint control. Surprisingly, this mutant could restore alignment and cytokinesis during unperturbed cell divisions and was capable of resolving syntelic attachments. Also, Aurora-B kinase was localized and activated normally on centromeres in these cells, ruling out a role for the coiled-coil domain in general Aurora-B activation. Thus, mere microtubule destabilization of nonbipolar attachments by the CPC is insufficient to install a checkpoint-dependent mitotic arrest, and additional, microtubule destabilization-independent CPC signaling toward the spindle assembly checkpoint is required for this arrest, potentially through amplification of the unattached kinetochore-derived checkpoint signal.