2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: the effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cuing paradigm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
307
3
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(335 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
21
307
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This proposal is also consistent with the findings reported by Bryck and Mayr (2005) which suggest that verbalization of sequential information in task switching is critical for maintenance of sequential courses of actions or sequential plans. These and other studies (Baddeley, Chincotta, & Adlam, 2001;Emerson & Miyake, 2003;Miyake, Emerson, Padilla, & Ahn, 2004;Saeki & Saito, 2009) strongly indicate that working memory forms a basis for task switching without implying that shortage of working memory capacity would completely disrupt task-switching performance.…”
Section: Modeling Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…This proposal is also consistent with the findings reported by Bryck and Mayr (2005) which suggest that verbalization of sequential information in task switching is critical for maintenance of sequential courses of actions or sequential plans. These and other studies (Baddeley, Chincotta, & Adlam, 2001;Emerson & Miyake, 2003;Miyake, Emerson, Padilla, & Ahn, 2004;Saeki & Saito, 2009) strongly indicate that working memory forms a basis for task switching without implying that shortage of working memory capacity would completely disrupt task-switching performance.…”
Section: Modeling Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Assigning people to perform an extra task while solving problems would normally reduce success at the problems, but this metaanalysis found across dozens of studies that assigning research participants to verbalize their thoughts while solving problems had essentially no effect on performance, as compared to performing the same tasks silently. In a similar vein, recent studies have shown that suppressing inner speech interferes with some executive function activities such as task switching (Emerson & Mikaye, 2003;Miyake, Emerson, Padilla, & Ahn, 2004).…”
Section: Talking Transforms Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is little doubt that these control processes must act in interplay with the contents of the phonological loop, but as already mentioned, the present study does not provide any direct support for this hypothesis. Nevertheless, a cooperation of the central executive with the phonological loop would seem more plausible (see, e.g., Emerson & Miyake, 2003;Liefooghe, Vandierendonck, Muyllaert, & Van Neste, 2005;Miyake, Emerson, Padilla, & Ahn, 2004), but has to wait for more direct supporting data.…”
Section: Load and Number Of Carriesmentioning
confidence: 99%