2015
DOI: 10.1515/congeo-2015-0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inner zone terrain correction calculation using interpolated heights

Abstract: The discrepancy between real heights of gravity points and the elevation model has a significant impact on the terrain corrections calculation especially within the inner zone. The concept of interpolated heights of calculation points used instead of measured ones within the specified inner zone can considerably decrease the resulting errors. The choice of appropriate radius of the inner zone for use of interpolated heights is analysed on synthetic topography model as well as real data. The tests with syntheti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the distant zones T31 (5.24-28.8km) ad T32 (28.8-166.7km) we used the SRTM (Jarvis et al, 2008) with resolution 3 and 30 arcsec, respectively. For the nearer zones T1 (0-250 m) and T2 (250-5240 m) we use standardly the above mentioned detailed model DMR-3 (TOPÚ, 2012), while in the innermost zone we use the concept of interpolated heights, which reduces the computation error originating from the misalignment of DTM with the real height of measured points (Zahorec, 2015). However, for the most accurate computations even this model becomes insufficient.…”
Section: Gravity Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the distant zones T31 (5.24-28.8km) ad T32 (28.8-166.7km) we used the SRTM (Jarvis et al, 2008) with resolution 3 and 30 arcsec, respectively. For the nearer zones T1 (0-250 m) and T2 (250-5240 m) we use standardly the above mentioned detailed model DMR-3 (TOPÚ, 2012), while in the innermost zone we use the concept of interpolated heights, which reduces the computation error originating from the misalignment of DTM with the real height of measured points (Zahorec, 2015). However, for the most accurate computations even this model becomes insufficient.…”
Section: Gravity Datamentioning
confidence: 99%