2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2022.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innocent buffers reveal the intrinsic pH- and coverage-dependent kinetics of the hydrogen evolution reaction on noble metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 18,37,43 ] The extent to which the overpotential is reduced with the SRBW, can be observed from Figure 2c to be 0.52 and 1.37 V for current densities of −10 and −100 mA cm −2 , respectively. More specifically, with 20 dBm SRBW, the system requires a 0.2 V overpotential to reach a current density of −1 mA cm −2 (Figure 2b), which is lower than the 0.3–0.5 V [ 17 ] expected for neutral electrolytes with similar molarities. For −10 mA cm −2 , the requisite overpotential of 0.4 V is approximately half of that reported for platinum (Pt) in neutral electrolytes, [ 18,44 ] suggesting that SRBW‐energized Au electrodes have superior performance to even Pt electrodes under neutral conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 18,37,43 ] The extent to which the overpotential is reduced with the SRBW, can be observed from Figure 2c to be 0.52 and 1.37 V for current densities of −10 and −100 mA cm −2 , respectively. More specifically, with 20 dBm SRBW, the system requires a 0.2 V overpotential to reach a current density of −1 mA cm −2 (Figure 2b), which is lower than the 0.3–0.5 V [ 17 ] expected for neutral electrolytes with similar molarities. For −10 mA cm −2 , the requisite overpotential of 0.4 V is approximately half of that reported for platinum (Pt) in neutral electrolytes, [ 18,44 ] suggesting that SRBW‐energized Au electrodes have superior performance to even Pt electrodes under neutral conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In addition to diffusion limitations, this is due to the rapid consumption of H 3 O + , which creates a bottleneck that limits the extent of reaction until higher overpotentials are able to drive H 2 O reduction. [10,[15][16][17] Even with the best electrodes (i.e., PGMs), H 2 production is several orders of magnitude lower under neutral conditions, [7] such that the overpotential required to reach a current density of −4 mA cm −2 exceeds 0.25 V in a 0.1 M KClO 4 electrolyte compared to as little as 30 mV in 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 . [18,19] Similarly poor performance is obtained with the use of nickel-based electrocatalysts, which are generally favored for alkaline conditions, given their affinity for OH − adsorption.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The invariance of the chemical overpotential across the entire pH range combined with the large change in the charge transfer overpotential provides the clearest evidence to date that HER efficiency losses stem predominantly, if not exclusively, from changes in charge transfer kinetics. Numerous previous studies have examined the impact of electrolyte cations and buffering species on HER kinetics, 15,[17][18][19][20]22 and we posit that the methodology developed here can be readily extended to isolate the relative chemical and charge transfer overpotential contributions in each case.…”
Section: Comparing the Chemical And Charge Transfer Overpotential Par...mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is now widely appreciated that that the overall kinetics of HER are strongly dependent on reaction conditions: on noble metals, HER kinetics are attenuated by two orders of magnitude in base vs acid; [11][12][13][14][15][16] the presence of alkali cations and buffering anions in the electrolyte can promote HER kinetics; [17][18][19][20] and surface bound species are known to both promote 14,21,22 and inhibit [23][24][25][26] catalysis. In all these cases, it remains unclear whether these dramatic effects stem from changes in the thermokinetic profile of the charge transfer steps, the chemical reaction steps, or some combination of both.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposing the intrinsic thermodynamic and kinetic factors controlling interfacial hydride transfer requires the separation of this reaction step from other competing reactions. Owing to all these complexities, the hydride transfer reactivity of surface M−H has been primarily investigated by computational modeling, [26][27][28][29][30][33][34][35][36] rather than direct experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%