2018
DOI: 10.1177/1049732318756056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovating for Transformation in First Nations Health Using Community-Based Participatory Research

Abstract: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) provides the opportunity to engage communities for sustainable change. We share a journey to transformation in our work with eight Manitoba First Nations seeking to improve the health of their communities and discuss lessons learned. The study used community-based participatory research approach for the conceptualization of the study, data collection, analysis, and knowledge translation. It was accomplished through a variety of methods, including qualitative interv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(88 reference statements)
1
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This age group is thought to have a higher familiarity with technology use and may thus have a different relationship to data from those with low technology use. We made a specific effort to recruit individuals who identified as Indigenous, as there are distinct norms and practices around data and data sharing in Indigenous communities that were important to reflect in the deliberations [25]. These recruitment choices were made to ensure "normic diversity," where the selection of participants is meant to ensure the presence of non-majoritarian voices as input to decisions that complements dominant voices and experts [26].…”
Section: Participant Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This age group is thought to have a higher familiarity with technology use and may thus have a different relationship to data from those with low technology use. We made a specific effort to recruit individuals who identified as Indigenous, as there are distinct norms and practices around data and data sharing in Indigenous communities that were important to reflect in the deliberations [25]. These recruitment choices were made to ensure "normic diversity," where the selection of participants is meant to ensure the presence of non-majoritarian voices as input to decisions that complements dominant voices and experts [26].…”
Section: Participant Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The partnership model that evolved through the iPHIT project provides an example of a successful university-community research collaboration and shared governance model. The project focused on the process of establishing relationships with communities, negotiating, and navigating meaningful collaboration between all partners, and keeping two-way lines of communication open throughout the duration of the project (Kyoon-Achan, Lavoie, et al, 2018). The goals of community partners were respected and supported, and communities maintained control over their own community data and research process, which is consistent with seminal work on the subject (Schnarch et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This was exemplified in the research collaboration: Project Elders were present at all yearly gatherings and included in all community workshops ensuring that community specific protocols were followed, and their perspectives were included in interpreting the findings. The findings of the research are the subject of other iPHIT publications (Kyoon-Achan, Lavoie et al, 2018;Kyoon-Achan, Philips-Beck, et al, 2018). It is important to appreciate that the participatory nature of the project resulted in more meaningful and useful data, increased trust in the research process and in the researchers themselves and the benefits of collaborating with First Nation and Indigenous organizations.…”
Section: Project Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations