Innovation and economic performance in services: a firm-level analysis

Cainelli, Giulio; Evangelista, Rinaldo; Savona, María

doi:10.1093/cje/bei067

Cited by 366 publications

(222 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

196

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These results are available upon request from the corresponding author. found to be quite different (Miozzo and Soete 2001;Cainelli et al 2006). Therefore, the analysis undertaken in this paper focuses on manufacturing firms with more than nine employees.…”

Section: Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

Formal and informal external linkages and firms’ innovative strategies. A cross-country comparison

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

Formal and informal external linkages and firms’ innovative strategies. A cross-country comparison

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this respect, the model considers symmetrical shocks whereas in reality these shocks are asymmetric and de facto leading to sectoral differences in the growth rates and output concentration. However, this asymmetry can hardly be introduced directly in the model, but evidences sustaining this idea might be found in micro-level empirical contributions (Savona, 2004;Cainelli, Evangelista, and Savona, 2006).…”

Section: Simulation Results: the Case Of Germanymentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolutionary micro-dynamics and changes in the economic structure

Lorentz¹,

Savona

2009

Schumpeterian Perspectives on Innovation, Competition and Growth

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper develops a growth model with evolutionary micro-founded structural change. The model endogenises both technical change and changes in final and intermediate demand as affecting macro-economic growth, through the structural change of the economy. The aim is to formally account for the empirical stylised fact of the changes in the sectoral structure of the economy which have led to the growth of services in most advanced countries over the last decades. At the mesomacro level of analysis, we investigate whether the structural changes leading to the growth of services are mainly demand-led, both in terms of final consumption and intermediate demand. At the micro-level of analysis, we explore whether demand constraints affect the degree of exploitation of technological opportunities. The simulated results are based on the use of the actual Input-Output coefficients in the case of Germany. Four scenarios have been identified, which account for the effects of a set of key parameters on the changes in the structure of the economy.

show abstract

“…These relationships have been found to hold in large CIS-based samples of firms in various European countries (Cainelli et al, 2006;Crespi et al, 2006;Duguet, 2006;Hall and Mairesse, 2006;Lööf and Heshmati, 2006;Parisi et al, 2006;Van Leuwen and Klomp, 2006). A few studies with availability of CIS data for more than one country have also presented comparative exercises (e.g.…”

Section: The Literature On Innovation and Firm-level Productivity Growthmentioning

confidence: 95%

Technological regimes, Schumpeterian patterns of innovation and firm-level productivity growth

Castellacci

Zheng

2010

Industrial and Corporate Change

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper investigates the relationships between technological regimes and firm-level productivity performance, and it explores how such a relationship differs in different Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. The analysis makes use of a rich dataset containing data on innovation and other economic characteristics of a large representative sample of Norwegian firms in manufacturing and service industries for the period 1998-2004. First, we decompose TFP growth into technical progress and efficiency changes by means of data envelopment analysis. We then estimate an empirical model that relates these two productivity components to the characteristics of technological regimes and a set of other firm-specific factors. The results indicate that: (1) TFP growth has mainly been achieved through technical progress, while technical efficiency has on average decreased; (2) the characteristics of technological regimes are important determinants of firm-level productivity growth, but their impacts on technical progress are different from the effects on efficiency change; (3) the estimated model works differently in the two Schumpeterian regimes. Technical progress has been more dynamic in Schumpeter Mark II industries, while efficiency change has been more important in Schumpeter Mark I markets.

show abstract

Innovation and economic performance in services: a firm-level analysis

Cited by 366 publications

References 46 publications

Formal and informal external linkages and firms’ innovative strategies. A cross-country comparison

Formal and informal external linkages and firms’ innovative strategies. A cross-country comparison

Evolutionary micro-dynamics and changes in the economic structure

Technological regimes, Schumpeterian patterns of innovation and firm-level productivity growth

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About