Innovation and knowledge creation: perspectives on the SMEs sector

Abstract

PurposeThe paper aims to look at small to medium‐sized enterprises' (SMEs') approach to learning and innovation.Design/methodology/approachThe first research direction focuses on the internal and external sources for learning used in the innovation process. A second research direction focuses on the main types of innovation SMEs engage in along with some of the obstacles or constraints identified within the innovation process. In order to answer the research questions set, the authors conducted a survey among 161 Romanian SMEs from various economic sectors and covering different geographical areas.FindingsRomanian SMEs display a learning orientation related to innovation, using best practices within the organization and networking with external partners as internal sources for learning, whereas in terms of external support for learning, SMEs consider changes that take place on the market, changes in technology and the input from experts and consultants. Concerning the innovation type, Romanian SMEs are very much oriented towards innovation in their business model, at the same time being faced with various constraints such as lack of funds and high costs involved.Practical implicationsFirstly, in what concerns the organizational learning dimension, the need for SMEs to focus on strengthening the collaboration with universities (higher education area), as the research pointed out that only few SMEs rely on universities and educational institutions in acquiring knowledge. Secondly, to focus on innovation and manage innovation activities as a core competency inside the firm in relation to designing a process of organizational change in SMEs, which should enhance drastically the performance of such initiatives.Originality/valueSo far, few studies have been conducted on innovation and knowledge creation in South‐Eastern European SMEs. The findings presented in the paper offer a holistic view of the innovation approach in Romanian SMEs, emphasizing the predominant type of innovation implemented along with specific constraints applied. The originality of the paper also relates to the fact that few studies conducted in Romania on SMEs focus on the internal and external sources of knowledge in the innovation process.

Business models, intangibles and firm performance: evidence on corporate entrepreneurship from Italian manufacturing SMEs

“…However, Kuratko and Audretsch (2009) pointed out that BM changes, like all the other focal points of strategic entrepreneurship, represent the tools through which opportunities are realised. This is increasingly true for both large and small enterprises (Purcarea et al 2013).…”

The Spread of Knowledge Management in SMEs: A Scenario in Evolution

“…From the nine papers regarding the Contingency Factors, it clearly emerges that KM processes are influenced by a variety of factors that may be grouped into three main categories: Industrial organization, which includes the agglomeration economies [34][35][36] and industrial characteristics [37]; Environmental factors, i.e., social context [38,39], environmental commitment [40], geographic proximity to the knowledge sources [41], and Firm specific factors, namely international interactions and organizational proximity [39,41], and organization size [42]. The 28 papers concerning Critical Success Factors offer a comprehensive framework of the factors that affect KM adoption and show that they may be classified into three main categories: Human and cultural factors, which includes human resources, people skill, motivation, training and education, a culture of collaboration and trust [23,24,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58], Technical factors, namely the degree of IT applications, the information system, infrastructure, degree of KM adoption, Total Quality Management practices [23,24,47,[49][50][51][52]54,56,59], and Managerial factors, i.e., cultivating trust, KM strategy, i...…”

Quantitative Evaluation Technique of Sme’s Competitive Advantage on the Basis of Saw Method

“…Yet other articles emphasize the dynamism of both gain of markets and competitive advantage (Zahra et al 2006), solutions to ensure the manifestation of synergistic effect (Simmons et al 2009;Geoff et al 2009). Krisciunas and Greblikaite (2007) examine the issue on the basis of SMEs in Lithuania, identify and analyse in detail expenditures on innovations and R&D factor. It is not surprising, as in this respect even innovative SMEs in Lithuania are roughly at a medium level among the EU member states.…”