2011
DOI: 10.4018/ijstmi.2011010102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovation Dynamics in a Monopsony Structure

Abstract: Innovation is a widely recognised driver of markets for economic growth and technological progress. This paper investigates the innovation dynamics in a monopsony market with a governmental monopsonist. The research is based on an agent-based model published for a traditional, competitive oligopoly market structure and explains aspects of innovation dynamics, such as how innovation is created, how the strategies of imitation and innovation pay off, the diffusion of both strategies and factors that influence th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Until the early 2000s, the space industry did not present the proper conditions in which private actors could invest and create added value for a series of reasons. First, space activities mainly addressed public institutions, governments and service providers which indeed were the most important customers, making the market a kind of “governmental monopsony” (a single or dominant buyer dealing with multiple sellers) (Smyrlakis et al , 2011). Second, because of the long time needed to contract, procure and deliver (Sheffer et al , 2000), space business was too expensive for new incumbents.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until the early 2000s, the space industry did not present the proper conditions in which private actors could invest and create added value for a series of reasons. First, space activities mainly addressed public institutions, governments and service providers which indeed were the most important customers, making the market a kind of “governmental monopsony” (a single or dominant buyer dealing with multiple sellers) (Smyrlakis et al , 2011). Second, because of the long time needed to contract, procure and deliver (Sheffer et al , 2000), space business was too expensive for new incumbents.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%