1993
DOI: 10.5465/amr.1993.3997518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovation Modification During Intraorganizational Adoption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
105
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
105
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in previous studies (Greenhalgh et al, 2004;Lewis & Seibold, 1993;Rogers, 2003), observability and reinvention are highlighted in this study as they are associated with shorter delays in implementation (reinvention only) and with intensity. Whereas some innovations may be difficult to observe (Rogers), others like this new practice are easily detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in previous studies (Greenhalgh et al, 2004;Lewis & Seibold, 1993;Rogers, 2003), observability and reinvention are highlighted in this study as they are associated with shorter delays in implementation (reinvention only) and with intensity. Whereas some innovations may be difficult to observe (Rogers), others like this new practice are easily detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…It has also been shown that contextual factors (e.g. intra-organizational structure, inter-organizational dynamics) may affect user's adoption of an innovation and particularly so in relation to the rules and resources that are introduced by this innovation (Lewis & Seibold, 1993). Implementation, by its very nature, is also a social process that is intertwined with the context in which it takes place (Damschroder et al, 2009).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of ERP is one of the most pervasive change activities that organizations have brought in during the last decade. There are several factors on which the outcome of any technology implementation depends, including activities of decision makers and on how end users respond to those activities [2]. ERP systems have been introduced into higher education (HE) sector to improve and integrate the management and administration processes in student registration, human resources systems and financial processing [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is ultimately humankind, who develops and operates both types of system (Van Staveren, 2006). According to Lewis and Seibold (1993), the terms system and structure have the same meaning in many studies. However, within the social system, as defi ned by Rogers (2003), the social structure is an element within the social system.…”
Section: Organizations As Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, within the social system, as defi ned by Rogers (2003), the social structure is an element within the social system. For avoiding confusion, the defi nitions of systems and structures from Giddens (1979) in Lewis and Seibold (1993) are helpful. Systems are "regularized regulations of interdependence between individuals and groups" .…”
Section: Organizations As Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%