2016
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-animal-021815-111414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovations in Canine and Feline Nutrition: Technologies for Food and Nutrition Assessment

Abstract: Pet owners have increasing concerns about the nutrition of their pets, and they desire foods and treats that are safe, traceable, and of high nutritive value. To meet these high expectations, detailed chemical composition characterization of ingredients well beyond that provided by proximate analysis will be required, as will information about host physiology and metabolism. Use of faster and more precise analytical methodology and novel technologies that have the potential to improve pet food safety and quali… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The digestibility of dog foods has been evaluated in vivo using dogs housed in metabolic cages as experimental animals (Brambillasca et al 2010;Dobenecker et al 2010) or, in some cases, using fistulated dogs (Yamka et al 2003a,b;Barry et al 2009;Faber et al 2010;Hendriks et al 2013). A comprehensive review of technologies that may be used to assess the digestibility of foods for dogs and cats has recently been published by de Godoy et al (2016). Methods based on the use of digestibility markers (inert and indigestible dietary components), included at low concentrations in the diet, are widely used [for example, chromic oxide (Guevara et al 2008;Barry et al 2009), yttrium oxide (Vhile et al 2007) and celite (Scott & Boldaji 1997)].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The digestibility of dog foods has been evaluated in vivo using dogs housed in metabolic cages as experimental animals (Brambillasca et al 2010;Dobenecker et al 2010) or, in some cases, using fistulated dogs (Yamka et al 2003a,b;Barry et al 2009;Faber et al 2010;Hendriks et al 2013). A comprehensive review of technologies that may be used to assess the digestibility of foods for dogs and cats has recently been published by de Godoy et al (2016). Methods based on the use of digestibility markers (inert and indigestible dietary components), included at low concentrations in the diet, are widely used [for example, chromic oxide (Guevara et al 2008;Barry et al 2009), yttrium oxide (Vhile et al 2007) and celite (Scott & Boldaji 1997)].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS), Van Soest analyses, and Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy, although these systems do not aim at the same set of parameters (Bovera et al, 2003;Godoy et al, 2016).…”
Section: Iag Estimation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crude fiber, which represents the type of dietary fiber that remains as a residue after food receives a standardized laboratory treatment with dilute acid and alkali, was similar for the two foods. (Fiber analysis methods are reviewed by deGoy et al [44].) Such treatment dissolves all soluble fibers and some insoluble fibers.…”
Section: Foodsmentioning
confidence: 99%