2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.07.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovative correlation for calculating thermal performance of counterflow wet-cooling tower

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the fill with a VG is better than the one without. The lower the approach value, the better the performance of the cooling tower, as it represents its ability to lower the temperature of the water closer to the wetbulb temperature of the surrounding air [5]. It can thus be concluded that a VG can reduce the approach value in the forced draught fill type of the cooling tower.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the fill with a VG is better than the one without. The lower the approach value, the better the performance of the cooling tower, as it represents its ability to lower the temperature of the water closer to the wetbulb temperature of the surrounding air [5]. It can thus be concluded that a VG can reduce the approach value in the forced draught fill type of the cooling tower.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been conducted to improve the efficiency of cooling towers. Improvement of evaporation can reduce the wet ball by 85-95%, while the filler surface affects the decrease in the ratio of water mass flux to air [4,5]. Interesting results have been obtained using a fill made alternative material such as pebbles, PET strip, and coconut husk and energy loses also reduced using alternative fill [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the efficiency and the outlet temperature are unknown, a correlation detailed by Mansour et al is used to calculate the CT efficiency as follows: ε=ε*ε*+1, ε*=()Cro()NTU10.5italicNTU()italicCroLG, italicNTU=cLGn+1, italicCro=bCp. …”
Section: System Components Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The L/G parameter stands for the water‐air mass flow ratio. Liu et al and Khamis et al studied the counter flow cooling tower and obtained an optimal L/G ratio of 0.83, which is used in this study. The constants “ c ” and “ n ” are characteristics of the cooling tower which depend on the geometry of the tower and the roughness of the fill material.…”
Section: System Components Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the reflux effect may occur in the cooling tower under the crosswind. This effect must be considered in the thermodynamic simulation and theoretical calculation of the cooling tower [12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%