2010
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201000812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovative Measurement Techniques in Surface Science

Abstract: We describe four new experimental techniques advanced during the last decade in the authors' laboratory. The techniques include photon scanning tunneling microscopy; aberration-corrected low-energy electron microscopy in combination with photoelectron emission microscopy, microcalorimetry, and electron-spin resonance spectroscopy. It is demonstrated how those techniques may be applied to solve fundamental problems in surface science with growing demands to tackle complex nanoscopic systems, and, in particular … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to identify the active part of the material we need to be able to study a very small amount of starting material and of products at the surface of the complex material, and we need to be simultaneously able to differentiate the surface of the material from its bulk. This requires the development of specific, surface sensitive techniques and, in order to isolate the action of the various material components, a systematic variation in the complexity of the studied material [7]. This variation has to proceed from the most simple to the more complex, and not vice versa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to identify the active part of the material we need to be able to study a very small amount of starting material and of products at the surface of the complex material, and we need to be simultaneously able to differentiate the surface of the material from its bulk. This requires the development of specific, surface sensitive techniques and, in order to isolate the action of the various material components, a systematic variation in the complexity of the studied material [7]. This variation has to proceed from the most simple to the more complex, and not vice versa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rapidly increasing number of surface science studies [3][4][5][6][7] reflects the actuality of this research, that has been initiated and influenced for years by the groups of Somorjai et al 8 , Hayek et al 9 , Goodman et al 10 and Ertl et al 11 . The second step is the systematic testing of the different model catalysts at higher pressures, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the 1990s and further developed by Campbell et al . The results from this method have been reviewed previously . The major advantage of using SCAC is the ability to directly measure the interaction strength of gaseous molecules with the surface of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These restrictions can be completely overcome by using a direct calorimetric measurement. To date, SCAC has been successfully applied to study the energetics of adsorbate–surface interactions for different molecular adsorbates on metal single crystals as well as on metal nanoparticles supported on thin model oxide layers . In the latter case, direct calorimetric measurement of adsorption and reaction energies by SCAC was combined with the tools for in situ preparation of model catalysts consisting of metal nanoparticles supported on thin well‐defined oxide films .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%